would u accept this trade if i proposed it to you?
2006-09-04 12:57:07 · 5 answers · asked by god 2 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
or how about jurevicius for coles
2006-09-04 13:05:01 · update #1
which side am I on?
I would rather have joe than randle el. Randle El made a bad choice signing w/ the skins. He's their 3rd option - good for a trick play and an end-around per game, not much more. Cleveland will be looking at Jurevicious more than the skins look at Randle El.
2006-09-04 13:13:23 · answer #1 · answered by mikep426 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey God, what's happening? Flat out...nope, you don't make that trade. Joe is a better WR than Randle El. You would be on the losing side of the trade; a place no one wants to be in.
Coles is an accomplished WR on a bad team. Swapping Coles for Jurevicious would be about an even swap. You gain nothing, nor does your opponent.
Bottom line is this, all three WRs mentioned here are #3 WRs at best. Unless there is a serious strategic reason to pick up Coles or Randle El, I see no reason to change. I had Joe last year and he produced fairly well for me. However, that was in Seattle and now he is in CLE. Bad QB and lousy OFF. Don't expect huge numbers from him, but do expect him to be consistent.
Good luck.
2006-09-04 21:27:41 · answer #2 · answered by defiantlysisko 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the only way I would accept that is if I were getting jurevicius. Randle el will not be an impact player this year with his new team. Jurevicius is in a contract year and is going to have an awesome season.
2006-09-04 20:00:37 · answer #3 · answered by Mike 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
neither sound like a good deal, joe could have a huge year or a bad one but unless u get kick return points for randle el too then i would not do it, and coles is a burnout w/ a gross QB so i would stick w/ ur man
2006-09-04 20:17:00 · answer #4 · answered by thumper 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no stay with jurevicius randle el will not shine cause red skins are stacked.
2006-09-04 20:06:25 · answer #5 · answered by dj su who 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋