Well, it would hard to do worse than this lot.
But please, don't pre-elect Hillary. Everyone seems so keen to elect her before the election has even started. (This is why I live in a state run by a Governator -- eughch!)
Couldn't we find someone who really gives a flying &*^%? Who hasn't sold out?
Oh. Guess I've answered my own question. Of course we can't.
sigh
I want my country back. (Not that it ever represented me, but something even remotely resembling human would be nice.)
2006-09-04 18:39:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by tehabwa 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
If America wants the thickest control freak to run them I say good luck.She is only marginally more acceptable than that one - Condi. Which makes me think, for a place as large and rich as the US, why, since Abe Lincoln, they haven't been able to get a decent President? Inbreeding?
2006-09-04 14:17:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
She Could b the repsntive of the Democrat party...and eather Condo Rise or Jeb Bush will b the reprsntive or the Rebublican party...and not eather of the Rebublecans r good...so she got mt vote if she were the reprsntive of the Democrate...cuz i'd like to keep the Bush familey away from the wight house...and if Condo won she will b the same as Bush cuz he crated her or in other fraze she was his advisor...so the Idea's r the same...
2006-09-04 12:55:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by International Nationalty 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Hillary Clinton is not going to be the next president of the United States. Her own party does not want her to run. She could be nominated but would never win. She is too polarizing. She would do a lot worse than President Bush.
2006-09-04 12:17:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
5⤋
Worse, It would be a disaster. I hope the citizens of the United States of America haven't completely lost their minds!
As for McCain he speaks with forked tongue. I don't know who I'm gonna vote for maybe Newt if he runs!
P.S.
W has done a good job and I would vote for him again if I could!
2006-09-04 12:34:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I wouldnt trust Hillary Clinton for that job, but I dont think she will be worse than GWB.
2006-09-04 12:24:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
I hope with all my heart that when we get our first woman president that it is NOT Hillary!!!!!!!!
Yes, she could do a much worse job!
I hope that McCain runs again.
Bush has done some good things but he is an oilman family. Did you really expect he would help the poor over the rich?
Anyone still feeling sorry for Hillary being married to a womanizer DON'T!! She has know for decades the kind of man he is and stayed with him to promote her own agenda.
2006-09-04 12:19:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by horsenuttss 2
·
2⤊
5⤋
Well, as a Liberal,she can't fail to do a worse job. They have destroyed Britain with their 'touchy feely' girly mentality, and they would certainly do the same in the US. I am tired of us pandering to feminists. That bandwagon should have been derailed years ago.
2006-09-06 08:10:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Veritas 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
Yeah, she is a possible. The bookies have her at even money, and bookies are seldom wrong.
Click this link for clues.
http://www.totalbet.com/totalbet?action=GoEv&ev_id=338240&Betting=Specials
I prefer Barack Obama a great orator, if not for this election the next one for sure.
2006-09-04 12:31:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by True B 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
1)After "W" this country needs a renaissance! I vote for Hillary.
2)Nobody could do worse than "W." Isn't that what "W" stands for?
2006-09-04 14:39:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋