Art. IV provides the right for extradition. So, here's the procedure (in most states).
The requesting state governor must execute an Extradition Warrant (request).
Person gets arrested in other state. His name pops up on computer for the extradition warrant. He goes to jail. He gets a public defender for the extradition hearing.
At the extradition hearing, the only (real) question is whether the person before the judge is the person identified in the warrant, and whether the warrant is in proper form. All other questions (guilt, etc.) are left to the requesting state.
Once the person's extradition is approved by the arresting state, he is transported (by the requesting state) to stand trial, at which location bail, charging, and all other decisions are made.
Good luck.
2006-09-04 12:14:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by robert_dod 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you live in Texas and have a pending charge in Ohio then you would need to go to Ohio to see a judge (magistrate). If you are arrested in Texas for the charge Ohio will only extradite for extremely major cases. If you are trying to just take care of the felony charge that you have in another state, your best bet is to contact the agency that the charge is with and ask them their procedure.
2006-09-04 12:17:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
they don't seem to be interfering with yet another united states's judicial technique, they don't seem to be making any demands in any respect. If the country the guy fled from does not choose him extradited, then that's totally advantageous too. without entering right into a debate approximately despite if or no longer dying penalty is authentic, particularly plenty each united states interior the worldwide makes the comparable requirement. there are distinctive worldwide treaties on Human Rights that have been signed with the help of maximum international locations (usually u . s . a . and China are the "significant" exceptions) that actual limit a rustic from extraditing a individual to dying penalty. i could be very almost particular that Canada is one between the signees of a minimum of one such treaty, meaning they're prohibited with the help of worldwide regulation from such extradition. this is not basically them being obdurate.
2016-12-18 04:55:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you are charged with a crime they can extradite you to the state where the crime happened.
If you are wanting your case moved from your state where it happened, to another state that is change of venue and you would have to file a motion with the court where you are at, to have the case moved, and who why. ( most likely it will not happen)
2006-09-04 15:52:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Article IV Section 2 of the Constitution:
"A person charged in any state with treason, felony, or other crime, who shall flee from justice, and be found in another state, shall on demand of the executive authority of the state from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the state having jurisdiction of the crime."
2006-09-04 12:10:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It may help you (or maybe not) if you could give a scenario that matches the kind of situation you inquire about. Otherwise those in the know here have a more difficult time addressing the specifics of your interests.
2006-09-04 14:27:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by nothing 6
·
0⤊
0⤋