English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Andrew Sysmonds
Adam Gilchrist
Mathew Hayden
sysmonds can stands fresh even after scoring 150 runs
gilchrist keeps for 50 overs and bats for more than a hour.(stamina is high for him i think)
hayden can bat for hours as he in test matchs

whom do u think has got stamina and strength
on ur opinon who is strongest of all

2006-09-04 12:02:04 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Cricket

7 answers

hayden wieghs more and is the strongest

2006-09-04 16:39:35 · answer #1 · answered by Zuhair-from-pakistan 4 · 0 0

I guess physical fitness of Mathew Hayden is better then Andrew Symonds coz i have seen Andrew Symonds getting sometime tired while he is playing on ODI matches and infact Symonds is a One Day Specialist but Mathew Hayden can stay in the wicket for long time and has an ability to score big runs...

A. Gilchrist is last among these players...

2006-09-05 02:56:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I strongly feel that Andrew Symonds is strongest of other two as he bowls and bat well. It requires lot of energy for bowling and then do the batting the way he bats.

2006-09-05 00:59:01 · answer #3 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0 0

Gilchrist and Zimbabwean contemporary Andy Flower are generally considered the best batsmen to play as regular wicketkeepers for their national teams. The standard of batting expected of wicketkeepers has improved over the course of cricket history and particularly in the past few decades, but both are of such quality as to be regarded amongst the finest batsmen of their generation regardless of their wicketkeeping abilities. Comparing them is difficult. In Test cricket, Flower played as a top-order batsman who had to serve as the backbone of a weak Zimbabwe lineup, whereas Gilchrist usually has the luxury of going in at number seven after the strong Australian batting had tired opposition bowlers and was consequently able to use his attacking prowess to slaughter such a weakened attack, with a scoring rate more akin to one-day cricket than test matches. He is almost certainly the strongest batsman ever to regularly play at number seven, though this is mainly a reflection of the strength of the Australian team that they can afford to play him there. Gilchrist has a full complement of attacking shots; he is equally powerful on the back or front foot, making him extremely difficult to bowl to. Perhaps his main weakness for bowlers to exploit is his very propensity for attacking play. He briefly held the record for the fastest double century in tests, requiring 212 balls for the feat in a test against South Africa in Johannesburg in January 2002 (the record was then broken in an amazing innings by Nathan Astle in March of that year

2006-09-05 02:12:22 · answer #4 · answered by JJ 4 · 0 0

Andrew Symonds but this is not a good question

2006-09-05 08:49:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Andrew Symonds.
Seeing him at a glance, we can atleast think how powerful he is.

2006-09-04 19:44:06 · answer #6 · answered by chunnu 4 · 0 0

symonds is very bulky and looks a strong fellow

2006-09-05 03:09:29 · answer #7 · answered by shivam 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers