no
2006-09-04 11:59:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by im so fly 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, The Ultimate Warrior is not Undertakers brother no more than Kane is.
2006-09-04 19:02:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by v_crimson_shadow_v 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
maybe, but Kane sounds more like Undertaker's brother eventhough they don't look a like.
2006-09-04 19:01:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Yangster 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i thought the ultimate warrior deid
2006-09-08 06:21:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by bkerr36@sbcglobal.net 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I dont think so, maybe you should look at their last name and see if they are related to eachother the otherway than basing their relationship on looks.
2006-09-05 11:15:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by DARIA. - JOINED MAY 2006 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
who told ya that sh*t? no they're not!!!
they don't look alike! taker looks so much better than the warrior!!!
2006-09-05 07:55:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No there not, there is a list of family, not family in the web site www.wrestlingplanet.com this should help you.
2006-09-08 00:05:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Teddy Bear 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope, They are definately not brothers.
2006-09-05 11:27:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
this might change your mind.http://www.obsessedwithwrestling.com/profiles/u/ultimate-warrior.html
2006-09-04 19:01:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
nah
2006-09-07 11:06:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by king 5
·
0⤊
0⤋