No you not. Oh it's true it's freaking true.
2006-09-04 11:20:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Smooth talking 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
you probably did no longer ought to apply their unique image to infringe copyright. All you had to do replaced into to recreate the picture which, it type of feels, you probably did via bringing mutually the shapes that make up the picture. the emblem is likewise a commerce mark that you do not have the right to apply so that you've gotten executed more effective than copyright infringement. If the criticism has come from the owner of the London Underground form or from a regulation agency appearing on their behalf, i ought to take it heavily. no matter if that is from them, they could have despatched a letter telling you to 'end and desist' from making use of the emblem. even with the reality that if the criticism has come from someone who has no rights to the emblem, it ought to nevertheless be smart to end making use of a form to that you're not any more entitled. yet another plan of action should be to seek permission to apply the emblem for your objective yet I doubt if permission should be granted.
2016-12-06 09:58:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by glordano 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here's what the US Copyright Office has to say:
"Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include —
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors."
Hope that helps! I wish you much success & happiness in all your ventures!
2006-09-05 09:40:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by TM Express™ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just e-mail the site, tell them what you want it for and ask permission. If they can grant it they will; most people are only too happy to.
Or get Inkscape, import the photo and use it as a template; draw over it, resize to print.
If you reproduce the image without permission you are infringing copywrite. Making money is not the issue.
2006-09-04 11:32:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by sarah c 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
If the site says you must attain permission to use the pictures then this is what you must do.
Without the above disclaimer you can use the pictures as long as you don't use it to make money, claim as yours and you give full credit to the designer or manufacturer close to the picture(s).
You cannot claim credit or accept credit for the pictures of the device, design or anything about it.
2006-09-04 11:33:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Retain the copyright of the original photo in your print, or add it to your material if the photo's copyright wasn't already there. This isn't so much for respect for copyright law as it is intellectual honesty.
2006-09-04 11:20:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not if you're NOT making money. If you sell the poster than yes you are.
2006-09-04 11:16:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Justin W 2
·
1⤊
0⤋