2006-09-04 10:33:59 · 5 answers · asked by TMel 1 in Travel ➔ United States ➔ Other - United States
Neither. They are both necessary and beautiful.
2006-09-04 10:39:04 · answer #1 · answered by Gwen 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are some places where you don't have to make a choice ... you get both in the same location .... like Oregon and Washington along the coast, and Vancouver, BC, you get a city, the ocean, mountains, rivers, and so much more all in one place!!
Thus, my answer is ... yes, both!!!
2006-09-04 14:55:30 · answer #2 · answered by Pichi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mountains because there is much to do biking, hiking, fishing, wildlife, camping, campfires, rock hunting, hunting,rainbow trout, endangered animals that u can only find in mountains.
TJforever
2006-09-04 11:14:07 · answer #3 · answered by TJforever 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Great Lakes.
2006-09-05 01:20:36 · answer #4 · answered by AF 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mountains. No sand on your shorts and more shade to prevent sunburn.
2006-09-04 10:39:08 · answer #5 · answered by Jacob A 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋