Would save American lives and money.
Why not?
2006-09-04 10:06:45 · 20 answers · asked by Roger 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Of course not
1. After a nuclear weapon has been used, the area can not be inhabited for at least 10 years... they have a lot of oil that is needed by the entire world.
2. It is inhumane - what about all the civilians
3. The rest of the world would never forgive us. I doubt we would ever have another ally and we would become isolationist.
4. We don't have that right.
2006-09-05 17:45:13 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we had nuked them 3 years ago you would be buying gas for a buck a gallon.
That famous night when Bush said we have Saddam located in a Bunker in Badgag. They did an emergency phone call approval and Whammo
I remember the News that night "TWO 1000 POUND BOMBS".
What a Joke. Two bombs won't even blow all the paint off of a underground bunker. I have been in B52 attacks and a squadron can drop 750 1000 ponders on a target and a few people will crawl out after the dust settles.
We are not even trying to win anything over there. If we were the results would be horrific.
Go big Red Go
2006-09-04 10:21:50 · answer #2 · answered by 43 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We Should Pick A Few Good Targets,And Let Em See The Destruction They So Deeply Desire,I Would Pop Ole Saudis Butt Too,Allie My Aunt Martha's Corset,They Are The Worst Of The Bunch
2006-09-04 10:26:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you honestly believe that is the answer? If so, why didn't the United States drop an atom bomb on the USSR? We had the ability. Consequences, that's why. Do you believe that bombing the hell out a nation is the best thing to do? How many payloads were dropped on Vietnam, hum... Johnson eventually had to send in ground troops, and so did Bush in Iraq. But, I guess your response will be that we wouldn't need ground troops, because all the people would be dead, well so would our friends in the region as a result of radiation. Then the United States would be responsible for the genocide of Arabs, Jews and Persians! And North Koreans, then we would be pretty much dead, too as China would drop a bomb on us, I guess it's a win win, right?
Sanrun
2006-09-04 10:34:00 · answer #4 · answered by sanrun 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
How do you propose to Nuke an entire country? There are too many targets to destroy them all? ANd what about the millions of innocent people you'd kill for no reason? That sort of indiscrimminate killing would be against many treaties including the Geneva Conventions, and treaties have Constitutional authority once passed.
If we did this we'd cease to be America and we might as well be Iran.
2006-09-04 10:13:37 · answer #5 · answered by Charles D 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
My dad believes that we should evacuate every innocent man, woman, and child from Iraq and give them 3 days to do it. After that, it's "nuke em'."
I, on the other hand, am not so sure. Nuking an entire country is just wrong.
2006-09-04 10:30:38 · answer #6 · answered by chrstnwrtr 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
And be done with what? You think all problems will stop if we annihilate some countries? You don't think the repercussions would echo throughout the entire Middle East?
And we would definitely begin "fighting them at home."
2006-09-04 10:13:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
This makes me want to puke. What about the 100 or so million lives that will be decimated in those countries? You are not the only one with the right to live.
2006-09-04 10:13:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
That is the most intelligent question I've read all month! Amen to that brother! Save American LIVES AND MONEY! AMEN TO THAT!
2006-09-04 10:29:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Every where I go and every country I visit I always hear this "MAN AMERICANS ARE STUPID BLOOD SUCKERS" and i always wounder why people from all around the world hates Americans!!!????
Now I know why.
2006-09-04 10:29:56 · answer #10 · answered by zakum2000 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋