BIG BANG !!! the beginnings?

Question

if the greatest velocity is light, and the universe started as a super dense singularity,, how did it explode?
light cant escape from a blackhole,, and this singularity was suppose to be a monster...why didnt it collape as soon as it started....i know i was there once but i cant remember

Answer 1

According to the Begy theory of gravitational force, the big bang has no beginning. According to this theory gravity is an outside force acting upon the universe rather than from within, hence as the most powerful force acting on the universe rather than causing a calamitous collapse gravity is constantly pouring energy into the universe and is responsible for the existence of the universe. To understand how this is possible, imagine that it was a force that was causing an accelerating expansion of everything in the universe, how could you detect this force?

Simple really place a small object between your thumb and forefinger. Now let it go. It appears as though masses attract one another when in reality the expansion of all matter is causing masses to collide. This is not a perfect explanation, but it does help one to comprehend how such a force could act upon the universe.

In addition this force would allow for the atom to exist without the need for a strong and weak nuclear force. The Begy atomic theory requires however the presence of the neutron(s) in every atom save hydrogen.

Why does this indicate a Big Bang with no beginning? reverse the expansion... how far could you go back?

Black holes? Either they do not exist or if they do they are points in space where gravities influence is negated. You will have to give this a little thought but imagine matter entering a region of space where gravity does not affect mass, what would happen according to the Begy theory? If they do exist and you could transition into such an area instantaneously... Wow that is difficult to think about.

Answer 2

And here erupts the great God vs Big Bang debate once again...

To be honest, I think theres an element of truth in both. The Big Bang makes scientific sense up to a point...the only slight problem is this....

you start with nothing...then you have an explosion - how does that work if there is nothing to explode? That's why I believe there is a God and that He has that crucial part to play in creation. The rest of it may well have unfolded as scientists believe, with a little help from God!

Science can't provide all the answers, simply because some stuff just isnt physically possible...so theres always room for another explanation as to how life came about....

Answer 3

The answer I'm going to give you came from the NOVA science site.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/dimensions.html

Also see : History of the universe

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/universe/history.html

It involves string theory, the idea that our universe is composed of 11 dimensions - 9 dimensions of space - and 2 dimensions of time - and the possible existence of parallel universes. Yes - I know - the website says only 10 dimensions. It depends on which particular string theory is correct.

However . . .

According to string theory, gravity is not the weak force we once thought it was, but extends throughout hyperspace. It is also capable of transferring energy and momentum through hyperspace as well.

Although the universe began as a singularity, or black hole, it began to expand due to a collision in hyperspace with another brane - or parallel universe. This collision began an expansion of OUR universe, which proceeded at a velocity that was many times faster than the speed of light.

That sounds like a contradiction in terms, since according to popular belief, Einstein said that nothing could travel faster than the speed of light. Actually? Einstein never said that. What he said was, that nothing could ACCELERATE to a velocity equal to or greater than the speed of light. And he was talking about matter and energy, NOT space-time itself.

The structure of space-time itself is not limited by any faster than light prohibitions. And neither are tachyons - hypothetical and still undiscovered particles - which ALWAYS travel faster than light.

Note: As long as they are ALWAYS moving at faster than light speeds, they are NOT in violation of Einstein's Theory of Relativity. Einstein only required that an object be unable to ACCELERATE from less than the speed of light - to beyond the light barrier.

If they are ALWAYS moving faster then light? Then they do not disobey Mr. Einstein.

On another note, when describing the nature of the universe, Einstein himself introduced something he called a cosmological constant into his equations. Somehow - although he wasn't sure why - it made the math come out right. Later he called it his biggest blunder.

But it may not have been a blunder after all.

In recent years - we may have found it.

While they actually didn't like this answer at first - years of observations by astronomers - finally convinced them there is an ANTI - GRAVITATIONAL constant at work in the universe, which almost exactly matches Einstein's cosmological constant.

In other words?

It was an ANTI - GRAVITY FIELD which was indirectly responsible for the expansion of the singularity as we know it. So anti-gravity exists - we just don't know how to make it yet.

What convinced them?

The universe is not only expanding - it's accelerating. It is moving faster today than it was yesterday. And tomorrow? It will be moving faster than it is today. The only thing that can explain this - without modifying the observed laws of gravity itself - is the existence of an anti-gravitational cosmological constant.

In other words? Einstein was right. He just didn't know the reason why.

You however - may be partially right in saying that nothing - not even light - could have escaped the singularity that was our universe - in it's formative stages. It depends on whether or not this is an open or closed universe.

An open universe will continue to expand forever.

But in a closed universe?

WE ARE STILL INSIDE THE BLACK HOLE.

The only reason why we are not "crushed", is because the DENSITY of this particular black hole is low enough - that galaxies, stars, planets - and even intelligent life was able to form - deep down inside of it.

Hope this answers your question. :)))))))

Answer 4

Not all singularities are black holes.

Black holes emit particles, by the way, or at least their event horizons do. Black holes that fall below a certain mass can explode with a very big bang indeed.

See Genesis I for a layman's description of the big bang.

Answer 5

I think that it is because the weak nuclear force was overpowered by the one that works the opposite way (I can't remember what it is called), and it "exploded". Light would have only "escaped" as soon as it started to "explode". Remember that it was a "cosmic soup" there were no compounds or anything, so it might've been a bit different.

Answer 6

If the big bang was the beginning, what was there before the beginning? And how can something exist before a beginning? But then is time linear at all?
There may be a big bang in my head shortly

Answer 7

i was sort of told by a lecturer who had an idea of possibly how it might have happened, it was very complicated and don't believe he actually had any idea at all, don't think anybody truly knows. P.S. the theory that god created the universe is stupid and propostrous, there is far too much evidence against it.

Answer 8

It's like the bat and ball on a piece of elastic..

Once all the expanding explosion/bat energy is used it will retract under the power of the elastic/gravity then it will contract again and explode. (Like the rubber being squashed against the bat)

Eventually all the energy will be used unless new energy is released. (Like from your arm)


Maybe......
But physics say energy can not be lost....just converted......

So maybe it is never ending......

You need to answer it for yourself unless someone can provide proof.

Answer 9

I was always facsinated on the Big Bang, but I'd never thought of that...thanks for giving me another thing to bother me till I find out haha.

Answer 10

maybe our big bang was someone elses black hole. matter in, matter out on the other side of the known univers... wormholes, singularity, call it what you will... and i guess it did collapse, almost as soon as it began, coz it ejected a whole lot off ejecta... which became our solar sysytem/universe/galaxy.

if it hadnt closed the singularity would have engulfed us. moments after we'd come thru.