circumcised vs uncircumcised guys, is there really a difference?

Question

I've been told "There will be more "friction". (with a circumcised) The entire length of the circumcised penis will move across your genitals whereas the uncircumcised penis will "glide" in an out under the foreskin." Is this true and which feels better? How do they feel different?

Answer 1

There's more penis with uncircumcised; maybe that's why it's more pleasurable. I greatly prefer a WHOLE man.

Answer 2

This is for "SirCumSized" who conveniently left out the fact that he has a circumcision fetish from his disgusting, packed-full-of-lies response. Gay men with circumcision fetishes will do anything to keep their boy mutilation fantasies alive, and they actually get off on describing it in detail on internet message boards. What he posted about genital mutilation (circumcision) is patently false, and completely bogus.

It is an indisputable FACT that the foreskin is the most nerve-rich portion of the male anatomy. Uncircumcised men enjoy sex more, and their partners enjoy sex more. One need only read surveys and research into the subject--where the partner had both experienced a cut and uncut penis. You cannot take surveys conducted in the United States, where nearly every boy is mutilated, seriously. THEY HAVE NEVER EXPERIENCED AND UNCIRCUMCISED PENIS! They are answersing with question to NO KNOWLEDGE!

Of course the penis feels more sensation when the skin is pulled back. That's what the foreskin is for! To keep the mucous membrane (head of the penis) moist, supple, and sensitive, so that sex is extremely pleasurable. Men who lack a foreskin have enlarged, kerotinized heads, completely devoid of the sensitivity it used to have. Years of being exposed to air and rubbing against clothes dries it out and kills the nerves. The head enlarges because it's been scarred! That larger head on cut guys is scar tissue--nasty, carved out, mutilated, kerotinized leftovers of their manhood.

The idea that the uncut penis masturbates within itself is totally bogus--if a man's penis is 6 inches long and he inserts into his partner, she is receiving 6 inches whether it's covered in foreskin or not. She is receiving that length of pleasure whether the man is gliding in and out of his foreskin or not. The whole notion of "KY JELLY" is something invented in the US, for mutilated men, so they can have sex with their partners, as their dried out penises are incapable of producing their own lube. Sex with an intact man is 100 times better, no ifs ands or buts.

"SirCumSized" asked you stare at a baby boy's MUTILATED penis and "imagine" how "ugly" it would look if it were as god intended. This is your first clue that he is a deranged pervert. There is nothing "beautiful" about a mutilated, carved up piece of anatomy. Imagine cutting off your thumb and "imagining" how ugly your hand was before you did it. Stupid.

To his last point, about AIDS, I am beyond words with the outright ignorance he spewed. People DO NOT GET AIDS because they have a foreskin--people get aids because they are irresponsible, and have unprotected sex with a partner who has AIDS. Chopping off the foreskin does not reduce your chances of getting AIDS by ANY PERCENTAGE, let alone the absurd 60% he stated. That's as assinine as saying that lopping off your feet will reduce your chances of getting the flu.

Answer 3

I was circumcised as an adult, well after becoming sexually active. I left it TOO late. Period!
True, whilst thrusting with an un-circumcised penis, the man has only half the exquisite feelings of his glans (penis-head) rubbing against the specially textured inside wall of the womans vagina. On the rearward stroke, the foreskin soon rolls over the glans to keep it covered whilst inside the woman. Thereafter his penis is merely sliding in and out of his foreskin whilst thrusting in her. To check this, try holding his foreskin back tightly with two fingers whilst he thrusts into you. Notice how much nicer he finds the feeling, and see how much nicer it feels for you too as a woman. With the foreskin held back off the glans, you will feel the shape and especially the outline of his glans-rim rubbing you inside.
Have you ever noticed how much better looking a circumcised penis looks???? Next time you see a baby boy having his diaper changed, imagine how ugly his penis is with the glans covered with that elephant trunk......
Imagine if your baby boy is now grown up and becomes sexually active, then tragically, he contracts HIV. It happens, to real GOOD people too, not only "BAD" people get AIDS! Then, think to yourself, I knew when he was born, that having his foreskin circumcised would REDUCE his chance of getting AIDS by at least 60%, but I didn't. Instead I listened to the "Au-Natural" thinkers and all the tripe about how good foreskins are. Yea right, ask the Jews how off-target they have been for 6 thousand years....

Answer 4

I guess circumcised since that the only kind I've seen Only seen 2 so it's hard for me to say
I mean two in real life...

Answer 5

I'm male, but I just wanted to say that I've read that most women actually prefer circumcised penises- but that in most cases there's not THAT much difference and either will do.

Answer 6

Yes - about 4,000 miles of sensitive nerve endings in difference.

Answer 7

This question is as tired as the do you prefer Pepsi or Coke.

Answer 8

they both feel the same
it doesn't matter to me either way is the same

Answer 9

I MADE THE CHOICE FOR CIRCUMCISED, BASICALLY BECAUSE I THOUGHT IT WOULD BE CLEANER, AND EASIER FOR MY SONS

Answer 10

mine is long and thick either way.