they need the terrorist as a voting base
2006-09-04 05:23:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hey Shirazzz
I have been seeing this question for some time. Not just from you but numerous people post this question.
I don't know many democrats. In fact I know more Libertarians then professing demo's. Non of them are anti defense or profess a slightly weak viewpoint on this.
SO is it a East coast woos factor. Because California has the most democrats of any State and also has the highest number of people that join the military. California is the strongest Military State but for some reason the thousands of Military families in California vote Left.
Curious
Go big Red Go
2006-09-04 05:47:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by 43 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The problem is that Dems do not see the threat. They do believe that there are people out there that want to kill us. This was the same problem during WWII, they would not get involved in the first place because they believe that if they burry their heads in the sand and pretend that if they are nice, none of the loonies in the rest of the world will bother them...that is a pretty deadly view on things. However, they also feel that it is more important to spend as much money as they can on social programs as well. It is their biggest goal to turn this country into a Socialistic country where the government has total control over everyone’s lives; and of course if they spend the money necessary to build a military strong enough to protect us, they will not have near enough money to achieve their ultimate goal.
2006-09-04 05:23:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dragonlair 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
They're just weak, period. A fundamental policy of income redistribution is a policy of weakness and when it comes to defense it's just more of the same.
The Weak Sisters on this "forum" probably don't even realize that their "hated" NeoCons were once strong-on-defense Democrats who bailed out once the '60s wack-jobs took over the party.
2006-09-04 05:23:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Walter Ridgeley 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The special interest groups they have to pay back are not military contractors.
However I might suggest that the GOP is more about military spending than on actual "defense" AND their imperialistic attitude (under the guise of protecting our interests aka markets) actually CREATE more terrorists thus making Americans less safe and in more NEED of defense.
2006-09-04 05:22:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by mymadsky 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Examples where dems have let the US get hit and done nothing?
Being against a FALSE war in Iraq doesn't mean defense weakness. What the f.u.c.k. has Iraq done to us?
2006-09-04 05:37:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Lotus Phoenix 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because they are in bed with the Terrorists.
Sleeping with the Enemy has a tendency to make one weak and to destroy one's ability to think rationally and clearly!
2006-09-04 08:07:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kitten 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
When you don't have enough troops left to fight another war, who is really weaker on defense...Dems or Republicans?
2006-09-04 05:17:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Brand X 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
they dont have time to think of defense, theres lot of memorizing of old gandhi and jesus quotes to become the next messiah... that is REAL work
2006-09-04 05:20:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by THE GOD IN YOU 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Says who? What are your sources?
Why spend 5 points to asl stupid questions?
2006-09-04 06:14:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by P P 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some people have problems with the idea of causing death. (death is a freaky subject)
2006-09-04 10:01:15
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋