2006-09-04 05:07:09 · 27 answers · asked by waniel_02 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Just my thoughts, But Im beginning to think its America and British against the other countries, for the oil, just because of everything I have read, and seen, alot of things don`t make sense, like when Bush became president, a lot of people resigned, he got into office by a mistake in the voting booths,the twin towers were hit, and Bin Ladin accused, but we went to war with Iraq, now not much mentioned about Bin Ladin, and No weapons of mass destruction found in Iraq YET, and NOW we are hearing that Iran has been making nuclear weapons, and they are planning to go to war there.
2006-09-04 05:18:09 · answer #1 · answered by theladylooking 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I even have not discovered Al Jazeera to be so anti-West. I study the paper, alongside with the Washington post, and others. Israel did not desire to occupy Lebanon interior the 80s. They have been protecting themselves against terrorists. Hezbollah is as undesirable for Lebanon because it is for Israel. Lebanon fought a civil conflict for Muslim civil rights, have been given it, and now Hezbollah is making an attempt to regulate Lebanon for his or her very own use. with out them, Lebanon and Israel might have a sturdy working relationship. Lebanon may be nicely off. Iraq? Saddam mandatory to pass. yet, i'm afraid Bush has rather messed that one up. we've civil conflict, and G-d help the folk there. you're saying united statesa. went there for oil------won't deny that. yet, i think of Bush is greater into pushing his sort of government and his Evangelical Christianity. If the conflict had long previous nicely, the government a democracy, then Bush might have stepped in pushing his faith. i actually do believe this. he's doing it interior the USA of a. it is frightening. This final conflict------Hezbollah began it via kidnapping squaddies. Then, they could not compete with Israel in conflict. Israel had to make a great push-while they're so outnumbered and placed the place they're-------it is termed survival. And,Hezbollah stationed themselves between civilians---wager they supply concept to them collateral injury, not rather worth something. What do you recommend via harmless slaves in Palestine? Slaves?
2016-10-01 07:25:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
in every country in the world of today you can say there are terrorists in it that doesnot mean at all that the country is terrorist just have some people who hav wrong ideas, but the main questions what is the main reason for that? the answer is that people in iraq ,afghanistan are the victims of a higher terrorists that are takinf their countries to hell without knowingthey do , britain is just a servant to america and all its role is to take orders and do it without even asking why? and about israel it is just like an embassy for the usa in the middle east at the shape of a country, they do things for america in order to be helped by them to conquer the middle east, this doesnot mean that someand i mean some of those in iraq are terrorists but it is just a reactionof being treated in the middle east as 2nd degree humanbeings, think about it please and i hope you understood my idea.
2006-09-04 05:19:11 · answer #3 · answered by egyptian one 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
All of the above...all of the above. Biggest terrorist? America...because it had no business in iraq, bush just wanted to settle some unfinished business that his father had left. 15 of the 19 hijackers were from saudia arabia, not iraq or afghanistan. US managed to plug Saddam out of a dirt hole, but they cant find OSAMA BIN LADEN, the real terrorist... Plus young men and women die overseas everyday, their not bush's twin girls, but normal average people that risk their lives for a country. While Bush, his boyfriend Cheney and their families get richer off of war. Making people pay almost three dollars for gas to help cover up the cost of this war. When the US could've used the billions spent on this war to help find a cure for AIDS or to lower poverty levels.
2006-09-04 05:22:16 · answer #4 · answered by ms_ricanluv88 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
First off....where would the world be without the U.S?
Under Hitlers reign? probably
The U.S is not a terrorist country.
Israel is an ally and the ONLY ONE who have balls to attack terrorists in its TRUE definition.
Iraq and afghanistan have people who blow themselves up for the 100+ virgins(yes, its not 72) and kill innocent people who are buying food.
The british are supporting the U.S because the U.S is also fighting terrorism, but not fighting its roots or close to it like Israel.
You need to study whats going on before speaking, i dont care if you report...your a ******* moron and shouldnt be aloud to be here because of your stupidity. If i rate you from a 1- 10 in an intelligence scale you'd be a -5.
2006-09-04 05:35:35 · answer #5 · answered by julean33 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Probably Afghanistan since they not only have terrorist but poppy fields, then Syria and Iran and finally Barney. Barney can defeat any terroist just sit them in a room alone with Barney and they will divulge all their secrets.
Seriously you would need to define what you think a terrorist is because it probably is dependent on your view. I mean in 1776 Americans were terrorist to Britain and they were tyrants to Americans. All depends on one perspective.
2006-09-04 05:12:23 · answer #6 · answered by Juniper 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think any of the countries are really terrorists, it's just a small group in each country that make the whole country seem bad.
2006-09-04 05:14:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Israel and America
Well, America is being used mostly, but they should learn to say NO to Israel.
2006-09-04 05:14:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Britain and America,are standing together as one,,,,we are fighting all terrorist,for the good of world peace,,,,,,,,,,dave UK
2006-09-04 05:15:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Israel and America supports it...
2006-09-04 05:32:35 · answer #10 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋