Real Deal, he's had no injuries or anything suspicious, like Giambi's tumor or Ortiz's heart or Bonds hobbling around everywhere.
Your right they should keep the 61 because evryone else cheated. They should put someone like you as commish
2006-09-04 02:25:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by c-money 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Without much more air-tight testing procedures, who knows? Just from looking at this man, it does not appear that way. He has a sweet HR stroke and a lot of power but he is 6'4" and 252 lbs. He does not appear to be muscle-bound like the obvious Bonds, McGuire, or Sosa. Of course, I don't know the answer to your question but a quick visual look at Howard makes me think he is natural at this point.
2006-09-04 02:24:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by perdidobums 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Um the record is 73 not 61, just because you think they cheated doesn't mean the records change.
I treat Howard just like I treat the others you mentioned: Wake me when there's some evidence. Currently there is none. So, innocent until proven guilty.
2006-09-04 02:48:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by jdbreeze1 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ryan Howard is not on steroids.
2006-09-04 06:34:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by CSUFGrad2006 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
bonds did not use steroids. and ryan howard is the real deal
2006-09-04 04:05:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by soranobody 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
howard is the real deal, he even was tested for hgh testasterone and was clean, he was tested for steroids too and came out clean, plus he works out like hell
2006-09-04 05:29:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by sakhi93 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is highly suspicious. All MLBers are questionable. He'll just have to pass the test of time.
2006-09-04 02:19:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Adam 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope, he's the real deal like Holyfield!
2006-09-04 02:42:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
at first i thought he was on steroids but then i knew that he wasnt buffing up or anything so he's a natural homerun hitter
2006-09-04 02:25:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by YawkeeFan 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hope not we want a real winner in Philly. GO PHILLIES
2006-09-04 02:57:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Harry W 4
·
0⤊
0⤋