2006-09-03 22:17:59 · 14 answers · asked by Snoop 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
I don't know.Good question.Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that society hasn't yet fully considered and/or realized and/or understand that gays and lesbians have relationships and families.
2006-09-03 23:26:45 · answer #1 · answered by BuckFush 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I think (or at least hope) that it does not mean these groups should be excluded from the Family & Relationships section. I think it makes sense because, for instance, a lesbian is still a lesbian even if she is not currently within a relationship. I think this section exists to discuss issues which would fall under the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender category but which are not specifically about relationships or family, such as advice about coming out or about LBGT friendly medical professionals, etc.
2006-09-03 23:44:21 · answer #2 · answered by wicked 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
'Societal roles brings order to the international which makes it much less complicated' -devoid of complexity, the international does no longer exist. Our brains does no longer even paintings... because of the fact that's complicated. What you're asserting right this is, "i won't be able to be bothered to discover the international and so i might like it to purely mean one element," or so as to speak. final I checked, violence on the harmless is against liberalism and if it wasn't for WW2, we does no longer be approximately 50 years at the back of on technologies and as a society (perchance if human beings had extensive-unfold the Nazi's takeover, we ought to been purely 25 years at the back of). i'm able to purely believe you on the feminism. Misandry is at an all time extreme. Yeah that's great that girls human beings have rights. If purely they have been equivalent to men too a.ok.a. women human beings additionally no longer allowed to hit men, abused men with the flexibility to circulate to an abuse look after. Orphaned and abandoned toddlers could have infertile couples that ought to undertake them yet there are not sufficient. Homosexuality looks to serve to serve 2 applications in nature; -- inhabitants administration -- Reserve mothers and dads those are the only applications that specify the way homosexuals might income nature. A kinder thank you to regulate overpopulation and to verify the survival of the greater youthful of a species. this might aide families if something.
2016-09-30 08:02:53 · answer #3 · answered by laseter 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Family & Relationships is more restrictive. Society & Culture includes those who you have no relationship with, such as anonymous people on the internet.
2006-09-05 17:02:15 · answer #4 · answered by kickbutt 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because they consider gay and lesbian people a community of their own, notice the sub-section's name, "Cultural Groups", which means groups of people having a culture or a sub-culture. But your point is still valid.
2006-09-03 22:35:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because the good people of the US still continue to see us as a sub-group of humanity, not as actual families. Sad but true. And since they will never let us get married, we will continue to be viewed as an alternative lifestyle and have our children and families viewed as outsiders and less-than-normal. Sorry...I live it too.
2006-09-07 18:22:10 · answer #6 · answered by Robin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess Yahoo is opposed to gay relationships!
2006-09-04 04:19:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because society considers our sexuality a "lifestyle", and don't want to offend the religious right by suggesting that we have "families" or "relationships".
2006-09-04 04:01:28 · answer #8 · answered by bluest storms 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Valid question, but I'm just happy that Yahoo recognizes us at all.
2006-09-03 23:29:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
maybe coz they think society is gay or les.
2006-09-03 22:20:04 · answer #10 · answered by Mister 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋