Originally, what we refer to as "alphabetical order" was random, however tradition and accepted usage has made it a well-recognized sequence.
2006-09-03 20:46:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Candidus 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
There is a theory that early proto-alphabets in the western world...were "rough" symbols of the signs of the zodiac along the ecliptic...[with a few additional signs that "filled in the spaces" or were important figures in their mythology...for instance...Perseus is NOT a sign of the zodiac but was central to Mithraic beliefs]
Understand that these "markings" did not necessarily resemble the alphabets that exist today....[I'm NOT talking about the English alphabet]...probably closer to Semitic or Babylonian/Assyrian or possibly Hittite/Hurrian scripts
over time, these "scribblings" lead to an alphabet, a written language...
This theory porposes that scribes/priests/shamans would have recorded these symbols as a way of recording time...so it may also in fact been the origin of a "primitive" calendar
2006-09-03 21:07:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Gemelli2 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The alphabet is in alphabetical order.
2006-09-03 20:21:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by redunicorn 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is in sequence as english came from new sounds from latin french and many other sources. And so the order is based on new sounds that we had learned
2006-09-03 20:27:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Doctor C. 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
thats weird i never thought about that...i guess its in the order that sounded the best i have no idea
2006-09-03 20:26:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by tokio hotel fan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
random
2006-09-07 12:10:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by jerry 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
guh!! alphabetical order.
2006-09-03 20:23:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Tina N 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
;kl aklj aopu[ pa9 a aj ][ ][P][P AL L;A'L W LAKJSD
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuLjuD3XrXI
2006-09-03 20:25:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by chancethepug 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
well its in an order-abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
2006-09-03 20:26:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by {««мα∂gυу»»} 2
·
0⤊
0⤋