I do....there wud be no smoke without fire...but it still boils down to the perception of the public..who wud they rather believe..and how good the different parties are at convincing the public tat each are speaking the gospel truth...
2006-09-03 18:57:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by aneurinaa 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Don't you think that if the government was culpable of such an elaborate scheme as the attacks of 9/11, they would also be capable of silencing all the dissenters who are coming up with the theories? Since most of those accusations are popping up on the Internet, wouldn’t they be doing what the governments of China, Russia, Iran etc… are doing and filter what gets on the Internet, then track the origins of the attempted postings and go pay those guys a little visit and arrange some unfortunate accidents. Website like LOOSECHANGE.com wouldn’t make off the server; guys like Michal Moore wouldn’t make it out the door. After all if the government did it they had to kill 3,000 of their citizens to accomplish it, do you really think that they would then hesitate to bump off a few dissenters who would otherwise expose them? After all, the people who start these rumors are not that many in the beginning and it wouldn’t take much to stop them at the root before the idea catches on and thousands jump on the band wagon. It would take much less to stop a few bozos than it would to put together all the intricate details necessary to pulling of something of the scale of 9/11. Would it not make sense to “protect your investment”? Just use logic. Your theories stop abruptly at the point where if they continued their logical course they would self destruct.
2006-09-04 01:55:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by scarlettt_ohara 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Mike and the loose change footage are excellent.
even if you take it as a worse case scenario it still points to the governments handiworks.
they have really pulled a number on the american public.
don't hate on mike and others who show this isn't what the government would have you believe. there is way to much "dirty underhandedness" at play.
find any mathematician, scientist or demolition expert to say "yes you can crash to planes at random into well built towers and get the exact same perfect demolition style collapse as what happened on 9/11"
also for buildings that on a normal weekday, no holiday, normally filled to capacity for the 8:00am wall street bell were virtually empty. final tally of deaths around 2500 out of what should have been 2-3 times that amount.
wake up people....think.
2006-09-04 01:33:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by mumin azraaq 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
Imagine this:
It's 1941 and the Japanese have bombed Pearl Harbor. America retaliates, bombs Tokyo.
In an impassioned speech to congress, Roosevelt vows to bring Japan to its knees, as America enters the second world war.
In response, David Selznick releases a documentary deriding the American war effort, calling it racist, and a ruse to seize Japan's assets.
He mocks the president, calling him a buffoon, and insinuates that he's in cahoots with the Japanese Emperor, and is declaring war only to further his own business interests.
Far fetched?
Fast forward sixty three years. Michael Moore, a traitor in liberal clothing did just that. His piece of celluloid treason made over 100 million dollars.
Folks, the US government couldn't even orchestrate a second rate burglary and coverup at the Watergate hotel. Does anyone honestly believe they could put together something as massive as 9/11?
2006-09-04 02:17:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
First off, ideation isn't a word. Second off, what conspiracy? Moore didn't claim there was a conspiracy, unless you count being dumb and not paying attention.
2006-09-04 01:26:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Johnny Tezca 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
the better question is who does not believe .
check www.infowars ,there is so much evidence ,from so many sources ,that to even doubt it is strange .
just check all the film clips that have been made by many people ,and you will see for yourself that demolition technolegy was used ,
the plane was just a bad failure of show for the sake of the public
it hit much higher than the explosions ,and the timing was way off.
the same technique was used for all the other attacks .just as much a bad show that totally failed to support what was said on the news.
And Moore only told fragments of the truth ,he was inturn covering up.
2006-09-04 01:32:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
The best conspiracy theories, much better than the Aliens from Roswell did it or the Zulus did it.
2006-09-04 01:28:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by kristycordeaux 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
He's a liar as much as Bush is. I think you might like 9/11 the road to tyranny a little better. http://infowars-shop.stores.yahoo.net/911roadtotyr.html
2006-09-04 01:25:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by morningstar 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
WE. SO believe MOORE IS SOoooo right!! Just LOOK!!! the guy is right!!! live with it!!
2006-09-04 01:50:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Its disappointing to see how far some will go. I have no use for them.
http://www.debunking911.com/massivect.htm
2006-09-04 01:27:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋