English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

After 10 years of study of human nature, I have found in almost 90 % of cases that a person of good nature (i.e. his/her good behaviour with other persons) is more likey to loose his/her character.

2006-09-03 17:49:06 · 13 answers · asked by Deve 2 in Social Science Gender Studies

After 10 years of study of human nature, I have found in almost 90 % of cases that a person of good nature (i.e. his/her good behaviour with other persons) is more likey to loose his/her character. By loose Character I here mean tendency to get attracted to apposite sex

2006-09-03 23:36:08 · update #1

13 answers

is it so!!!90 % of cases person of good nature is more likey to loose his/her charecter..
if it true find who is responsible.why d person loose his/her charecter..
i hav a answer...d person just want the samei.e good nature from other..think this is not a hard job for other..a few can give return,,,,
nobody in d earth born with roughness...its the surrounding what make d foul smell...so we we should not blame the good nature...its a gift...

2006-09-03 18:27:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

On the contrary, good nature towards others tends to show a healthy respect for other people, a key trait in a solid character. Those who are NOT good natured can not like others much, and therefore are far more self-centered, and more likely to do an amoral or immoral act to serve his own benefit.

2006-09-03 17:56:01 · answer #2 · answered by boj12345 2 · 0 0

As if too much suspicious of one's spouse. Otherwise one has to be careful in determining the motive of the other person behind friendly looks. Otherwise also a man who is too much busy with one's own problems donot find time and expression to reveal his real inner goodness or badness. Many people are suspected of having dubious character and intentions due to communication gap. A man with pleasant outlook is more acceptable not becouse of his good character but becouse of making him easily accesible. And the definition of character varies from person to person and society to society. The narrow definition of character given by most backward societies probably lconsider everyone as an embodiment of of bad character.

2006-09-04 23:24:50 · answer #3 · answered by orsel 2 · 0 0

Your observation is wrong.
See, I want to narrate one of my personal experiences.
While I was a student we were doing traffic surveys. In this survey one has to count the particular number of traffic ( pedestrian, cyclist,scooterist or motorcyclist, motorist etc.) at a particular junction and direction of a road for a day or so to know the traffic pattern for use in the road/traffic development systems. It was a sad period when we learnt about death of a prominent political leader. There was disturbances every where in the town and every person started shutting their shops. The local leaders and their workers were moving here and there to press to the shop owners to shut down their shutters. Under the circumstances one of our associates was busy taking the reading in spite of our repeated request that such type of reading is not normal and based on this any design will be faulty. The situation of the area was not normal and anything bad could have happened to us. So we requested him to quit the place for another day. Our dear friend was not listening to we unless one of the leaders came over to we people and in a strong manner requested to quit the place.
This is to say that one must be sensible enough towards what one is doing, what observation one is taking and what remarks one is passing.

2006-09-03 19:02:05 · answer #4 · answered by ars32 3 · 0 0

I think there is surely a point in ur question.
Otherwise pple like Laden or Daud Ibrahim wouldn't have been leading their lives so successfully, whereas we don't really remember a person who had really helped us in our bad times.
I think this world of human society has a reversed vision, so goodness is stupidity in practical lives, but when u question that u r threatened by answers as above, as if our society is the ideal place to live in.

2006-09-03 18:24:06 · answer #5 · answered by Tiya B 1 · 0 0

How can you say that a person who is of good nature is associated with loose character. May be he /she whom you have met are such simpletons who just cannot say no to anybody fearing they would hurt them. So these people are called SIMPLETONS or in straight words IDIOTS and not GOOD NATURED.

2006-09-03 18:30:11 · answer #6 · answered by dinesh m 1 · 0 0

I know far less good natured folks compared to ones I know with loose his/her character......... in this case 1+1 = 3.

2006-09-03 18:09:59 · answer #7 · answered by snickerboodles 1 · 0 0

A good nature is more apt to show a strong character, a strength of spirit.

2006-09-03 17:51:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

nicely I want this wasn't so male-based customarily. yet i presumed: a million)The Aries grew to become into fairly lots on. 2) The Taurus I disagree with... i'm specific there are some bossy ones in spite of the shown fact that it is not a known trait of this convenience-loving earth sign. it may desire to've been funnier if it grew to become into greater precise. 3) A Gemini long previous incorrect probable isn't a thief, yet would be a grasp of miscommunication. 4) maximum cancers could be self-pitying, yet in no way are they callous. lower back, may be funnier if it have been precise. 5) The Leo one grew to become into fairly sturdy, yet not fullyyt precise. A Leo-long previous-incorrect is greater possibly to declare you his materials. 6) Virgo grew to become into spot on. 7) Libra grew to become into fairly sturdy. 8) Scorpio additionally humorous. 9) Sagittarius grew to become into very nicely, however the Sag isn't maliciously including notches to his belt... he's only form of unaware that it is not ok. 10) great description of a Capricorn long previous incorrect. 11) Aquarius: precise and humorous portrayal :] 12) Pisces precise approximately co-dependency. yet they are not offering spectacular provides and reelin em in. i think of it would've been funnier to concentration on Pisces finished airheadedness. overall, this grew to become into only ok. each and every sign has some features that are relaxing to point out and tease em approximately, yet those weren't that precise.

2016-10-01 07:03:23 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

do you mean that getting attracted to others(opposite sex) is loosing our character
its not lking loosing character or loosing our good behavior but its a very natural thing
so dont think this way

2006-09-05 00:07:10 · answer #10 · answered by immine 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers