English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Someone told me there's a little queer in all of us. If so, I must have beat mine senseless years ago.

2006-09-03 17:42:56 · 23 answers · asked by GGman 1 in Social Science Sociology

23 answers

According to Alfred Kinsey, who created a scale (0-6) very few people are exclusively gay or exclusively straight they usually fall from 1 to 5, though they may never act on it.

Rating Description
0 Exclusively heterosexual
1 Predominantly heterosexual, only incidentally homosexual
2 Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual
3 Equally heterosexual and homosexual
4 Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual
5 Predominantly homosexual, only incidentally heterosexual
6 Exclusively homosexual

2006-09-03 17:46:21 · answer #1 · answered by Joy M 7 · 1 0

I don't think feelings for ppl are gender based. More like person based...but I've yet to find a miss.Right but I've had my share of Mr. Rights. I don't know wether you can be bi but a friend once told me..

If I love a person very much and this person loves me back, why should I worry about inconsequetial things like gender. It could be a quote I don't know the link to.

2006-09-03 17:55:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

honestly. Sexual orientation is a factor on a continuum; some each and every person is at one end, whilst others are on the different. some are at a evaluate between. The continuum is almost countless, and, definite, each and every person is able to admiring their very own gender to a pair quantity. I knew somebody who refused to assert that yet another guy grew to become into sturdy finding, claiming no wisdom of male splendor. in spite of the shown fact that, this comparable question dodger grew to become into very responsive to who his opponents for women folk human beings have been. He desperate this via how sturdy finding they have been!!

2016-10-01 07:03:06 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

According to some psychologists, like Kinsey and Freud, we all have varying degrees of bisexuality. I think it's a valid point of view, because if anything else humans are so wonderfully complicated.

2006-09-03 17:46:18 · answer #4 · answered by theonlymonsterdog 2 · 2 0

if we werent gay at all, it is not possible to have any sort of relationship with ppl of the same sex. Even a non-sexual relationship requires some emotion

2006-09-03 19:20:00 · answer #5 · answered by sum1 2 · 0 0

If your are saying some one told you about the truth of the fact, may he or she looks at his or her animal behaviour that exists in every one but not as a conscious and mindful human.
I believe that there is two centre of man and woman feeling in everybody but this is just about needed to parental love for their children that must have absorbed by children, and if they can not to have them they will go for some disordering in their normal life- I don't discuss about chemical reaction in the mind of Gays or queerer, I don't believe it at all.
As the matter of Yen- Yan, which is very ancient Chinese philosophy, we should fulfil our children needs as their father and mother, so if they are boys they can get their full behaviour of their father with absorbency of their mother's love so that they will go for their complete woman of their lives as their mother- not homosexual partner, and the same logic for the girls who can get their mother behaviour frame and absorb their father love and will go after their complete man of their lives.
I'm totally against your idea because homosexual is a kind of abnormality of the abusive behaviour- when you are talking about a little bit of gay matter and not when a person's hormones is totally wrong with his or her physical body feature, as you can see most of them have normal life and not homosexual relation with their partner.

2006-09-03 19:37:44 · answer #6 · answered by Nilpar 1 · 0 1

first off is responding to this question gay?Wasn't it Achilles the great Greek God who was so heart broken over the loss of his young lover(male) that he couldn't fight in the battle of Troy? It was acceptable then I've read in "The Illiad". But HELL NO! ( you silly goose!)

2006-09-03 18:02:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Oh that is funny! Beat him senseless huh?

2006-09-03 17:48:21 · answer #8 · answered by ihaftaknow 3 · 1 1

well when i was growing up gay mean't happy and queer meant a little weird....so, sure why not

2006-09-03 17:49:40 · answer #9 · answered by just my answer 3 · 1 0

I think there is a big queer in you. Two of them actually, in both holes!

2006-09-03 18:03:33 · answer #10 · answered by cognitively_dislocated 5 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers