The guy getting lewis and parker is getting screwed.
2006-09-03 21:45:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by howard h 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's a fair trade.
Lewis and Taylor are a wash, though Fraud is slightly more healthy these days. Wayne is much better than Parker. But Parker has some upside with Green looking his way more, and LJ commanding a defense's attention. Kennsion has been griping about his contract. Both Parker and Wayne play for productive offensive teams.
The Wayne/Taylor side gets the better deal, but it is not enough to veto.
2006-09-04 01:05:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
not fair for the person giving up reggie wayne, he is way too good to be traded for samie parker and jamal lewis, even if it were wayne alone. VETO!
2006-09-04 00:29:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by redsox10077 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
veto the trade. samie parker isn't going to catch anything for the chiefs and jamal lewis is going to have to share carries with mike anderson. reggie wayne is part of the peyton connection guaranteed for over 1000 yards and 7 tds and fred taylor doesnt have his backup to steal carries
2006-09-04 01:13:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by elbenito2513 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't want to be the guy getting Lewis and Parker, but I'm against vetoing any trade between consenting adults.
2006-09-04 03:14:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by dreth 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think thats it is a fair trade. jamal lewis will have a great year. sammie parker could blow up. you know what wayne will do and taylor will probably play in only 10 games max. seems fair to me.
2006-09-04 00:25:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by dre2000_22 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
whoever is getting Wayne is getting the better deal man. Lewis has gone down hill and Parker sucks.
2006-09-04 00:25:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd say yes. Both RBs are injury prone and old. Both recievers are dicey. I wouldn't want any of the 4 to be honest.
2006-09-04 00:26:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by aarongray45 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
ya do it good WR
2006-09-04 02:09:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by UAI 3
·
0⤊
0⤋