You hear the Republican's say that alot but why? How do you know what Gore or Kerry would have done surrounded by the best and the brightest. As we saw with Bush, the President often doesn't make the decisions, his people does, he just choose the best one out of a few. How do people know how these other two men would have done? Why do you think Bush is the lesser of the two evils?
2006-09-03 17:20:24 · 15 answers · asked by choyryu 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
PStone, you've dished out a lot of questions. Have anyone every asked you what the Republican's plan is on those questions other than to stay in Iraq? And how is it going so far in regards to those questions?
2006-09-03 17:42:22 · update #1
I don't think he's the lesser of two evils....the man is evil incarnate hiding behind the bible and the spectre of 9/11 while letting thousands of Americans die to satisfy his vanity. He is probably the most evil, most vile, most despicable person to ever hold the office of president.
2006-09-03 17:23:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush is the lesser evil because he actually has answers to America's problems. The Democrats have no answers they just claim that Bush is dumb and that he lied about the war. If Bush is so dumb how did he beat the Democrats twice? Democrats give us no concrete answers on how they would solve any problems. What was is the Democratic plan for saving medicare and social security? What is the Democrats plan for lowering gas prices? What is the democrats plan for Iraq and the war on terror? What is the Democrats plan for improving public schools? These questions cannot be answered because the democrats have no plans. The democrats stand for maintaining the status quo. George Bush and the Republicans stand for positive change. That is why Bush is the lesser evil.
2006-09-03 17:37:53 · answer #2 · answered by PStone 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush was not the lesser of two evils. A president comes with what is known as a cabinet, or group of advisors. They're like the angels/devils on the president's shoulders. Bush, being a big oil tycoon, has oil thirsty folks advising him of his moves.
2006-09-03 17:31:12 · answer #3 · answered by Bush Whacker 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You can never know how little of what the candidate promises will remain once in office. However, what Gore and Kerry *suggested* would be worse for the US. Would they actually have been worse? No way to know. However I certianly wouldn't risk it at this point.
2006-09-03 17:30:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
First, he stole the 2000 election by using his youthful brother who's the governor of Florida, alongside with Congresswoman (and previous secretary of state) Katherine Harris, and the U.S. ultimate court docket; and 2nd; he rigged the '04 election with funds! Is that adequate for an answer?
2016-11-06 09:22:13 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No one i know said that.. GWB is the absolute best man who would have the job at this present time... God willing , God will appoint just as good a successor for GWB.. I think President Bush has a date with Rushmore!!
2006-09-03 17:45:22 · answer #6 · answered by mr.phattphatt 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Kerry was supported by the Communist Party USA for President. It was all over their web site, their rally literature. 'nuff said.
2006-09-03 17:25:54 · answer #7 · answered by speakeasy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Spookydakat learn to spell before you talk about the government... As you can see bush is a terrorist! Except for the stupid people....
2006-09-03 17:29:04 · answer #8 · answered by natisoccer 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They're obviously comparing him to electing Paris Hilton for President. =)
2006-09-03 17:23:09 · answer #9 · answered by xdannifenx 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i dont think that- i think he is evil. but whatever gotta pretend someone else is president for 3 more years it sucks but whatever.
2006-09-03 17:23:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋