At first, I didn't even consider Bush to be a part of Sept. 11...but, once I started college, and studying white collar crime and a whole lot of other things... a lot of things don't add up from the reports of 9/11...then I kept replaying the attack and observing the precision of the plane making contact to the buildings...anyway,
the reason why I believe Bush is responsible for 9/11, is because it's been reported that he allows Bin Laden and his family to vacation on his ranch! Our soldiers are dying on a daily basis and citizens are vastly misguided all because of a few men's greed for power... I don't put it past this government, or Bush to being responsible for 9/11, if our government was honest in the beginning, then I'd believe the information that it provides...
Look, anytime NASA staged mans first time walking on the moon, then what else have the government staged? I know it staged some deaths over the years! Everybody knows that that flag that they show on the NASA film, isn't suppose to be flapping in the wind...since space is void of oxygen...okay, back on topic now =)
Yeah, I believe Bush is responsible for 9/11...I have a question for you though...why all of a sudden is Clinton hanging around the Bush's? What's that all about!
2006-09-03 17:44:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Even if you dislike the man (and I do) show a little respect for the office of president.
I think he has the morals of a skunk but there is no way in hell George W. Bush (or Bill Clinton) had anything to do with 9-11.
2006-09-03 17:12:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Doc Watson 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I doubt Bush had anything to do with it; however, I wouldn't put it past **** Cheney or Rove; perhaps even Rummy.
Why do conservatives (like Mike) always whine about the WTC attack in 1993 when it happened right after 12 years of Republican administrations. Also, why do conservatives never mention Reagan cutting and running in Lebanon after the 1983 terrorist attacks that killed hundreds of Americans?
2006-09-03 17:11:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
the worry with rather some human beings attempting to variety a logical argument is they don't frequently understand how Occam's Razor works with admire to motives. interior the 1st paragraph on my own, this placed up places forth 10 postulates that at the instant are not supported with the help of any evidence in any admire. and extremely frequently, I even tend to disbelieve something that asks me to have faith 10 new issues without evidence in the previous believing an eleventh element (that the U.S. did 9/11) i'm a scientist, first and ultimate -- i've got not got faith or disbelieve something that isn't be able to be accepted or shown. 9/11 performed with the help of Al-Qaeda? probably. 9/11 performed with the help of the U.S. ? possible. 9/11 performed with the help of extraterrestrial beings? additionally possible. yet for somebody to attempt to question me to have faith some thing without evidence, extraordinarily some thing that seems much less probably than a extra obtrusive, less difficult rationalization, is in simple terms soliciting for ridicule. No ask your self rather some those human beings whinge that no one takes them heavily.
2016-11-24 20:34:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is responsible for a lot of things that I feel are totally disgusting and wrong, but I don't think he was responsible for 9/11. He may be responsible for ignoring intelligence that told us it was coming, but if you're question is whether or not he had a role in what happened, no.
2006-09-03 17:02:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by rob 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
He ignored the Presidential Daily Brief which said on the front "BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO HIT U.S". He ignored C.I.A Director Tenants begs and pleads that "We are going to be hit, and hit soon". Congress proposes an extra 3 billion to go into fighting terrorists. Bush strikes it down. Bush's Daddy armed, trained Bin Laden in the late eighties.
The Bin Ladens and Bush's have investments with one another (Carlyle Group).
This says it all http://www.prisonplanet.com/911.html#reichstag
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=3710767957407328313&q=label%3Aterrorism
2006-09-03 17:18:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
i do.. i think that any leaders in any country are responsible in any terror act that occurred in their territory. The failure of the CIA, FBI, and all those institutions are really a part how Bush responsible in 911. like Suharto who was responsible in Tanjung priok massacre that occurred in Jakarta, Indonesia. But still, he's a free a man.
2006-09-03 17:16:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by jampangsunter 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think he is, bush is good at using fear to get want he wants no matter what the price is. He will tell you that he was not behind 9/11 so you need to think is that what he wants you to think or is that what you think.
2006-09-03 17:07:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I certainly don't want to believe that the US government could want war so badly, even the fiscal conservatives could not sink this low,.....
2006-09-03 17:03:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, and why don't you think Clinton is responsible for what happened at the wtc in 1993 when it was bombed or the USS Cole
2006-09-03 17:04:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋