I was autodrafted a team bc I couldnt make the draft. We start 2 qbs, my other is Brees. I know it sucks but w/e. So farve or grossman?
2006-09-03 16:06:08 · 10 answers · asked by c-money 4 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
That's a good question. Favre is the better QB (and I use the term 'better' loosely) but he'll be facing a tough defense.
Can't you pick somebody up from the waivers? I'm not liking either choice.
Go with Favre if you can't find another QB.
2006-09-03 16:10:12 · answer #1 · answered by RatherTallFella 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Go with Grossman. The Pack secondary is virtually non existent. He looked shitty in the pre-season but this is something else. The Bears D is too good for the Packs nothing Offense so Farve is a bad choice.
2006-09-03 17:18:08 · answer #2 · answered by aarongray45 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
farve. hes old but he's still a lot better then grossman. rex wont even be the starting qb for the bears by week 5
2006-09-03 16:32:26 · answer #3 · answered by The Guy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I didn't understand that you started two QBs last time you asked. Well, this changes everything. My first suggestion is to go to the WW and pick up Simms or Leftwich or McNair and start one of them. If you cannot do that, you are in for a bad day.
Favre is up against the number one D in the league. Grossman sucks donkey turds. If you cannot get another QB, play Favre because he is your most experienced and best athlete.
Good luck.
2006-09-03 16:37:36 · answer #4 · answered by defiantlysisko 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
drop grossman IMMEDIATELY. sadly though, brees is probably the best you've got right now. farve is good but age is catching up with him. he'll put up some numbers both good and bad. grossman will probably put up lots of bad numbers period. start brees and favre
2006-09-03 16:12:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Farve.. didn't you already ask this question?? I already answered this before. Farve is a hall of famer...Grossman sucks as aQB...
2006-09-03 16:13:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
both had ordinary messages of discarding the complicated dogmas of their be certain's faith and specializing in actually being a more effective human being. both had human beings coming after them that re-complexified what they suggested. regrettably, their similarities are lost on maximum cutting-edge Christians who view their own dogma as some thing that ought to easily accept their undying loyalty, as adversarial to a reasoned set of guidelines that ought to make experience (and that i actually element to Christians because Buddhists don't have a tendency to say such issues as "there is not any similarity").
2016-12-06 08:28:45 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
favre for sure grossman sucks
2006-09-04 00:26:19 · answer #8 · answered by matthew_bove 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
grossman, packers playing againts the bears defense. need i say more.
2006-09-03 16:08:17 · answer #9 · answered by Rusty Shackleford 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
go with the proven farve
2006-09-03 16:07:39 · answer #10 · answered by Andrew B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋