question no2:i think the persian president is trying for the best of his country and the american for the best his rich friends.I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S TRUE.what do you think?
2006-09-03 15:19:39 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
1. A Christian president talks to God but God doesn't necessarily answer. A Muslim president seeing visions apparently has direct communications with Allah. Who'd you trust? One who talks to God or one who has a conversation with him.
2. The Iranian president is doing what and as much as the Ayatollahs let him. Whether or not that is right for the country is yet to be seen. Iran is a theocracy and he is a puppet.
2006-09-03 15:28:37 · answer #1 · answered by williegod 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They're both wrong. Religious beliefs need to be left out of politics. That is what's wrong with the world - global decisions are being made by people who pass the responsibility they should be taking for their decisions off on dieties which may or may not exist. Both our president and the president of Iran are being competitive with each other to see whose "Rapture" they can make happen first. They're both a couple of religious zealots, but our president is a religious man only as far as he can use religion to manipulate the masses and to force his version of the "Rapture" before someone with a different God does so. Look at how many tax dollars our president has stripped from the pockets of ordinary working Americans who willingly let him do so because he is a "man of God". Fools.
2006-09-03 15:40:00 · answer #2 · answered by galacticsleigh 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's hard to say. It's bad enough when people believe in God; it's worse when state leaders proclaim that they have communicated with God. Of course in each case, it is their made-up God in their minds that they believe in - it's Bush's God and Ahmadinejad's God, not any kind of an Absolute or Ultimate God. This is dangerous, because in each case, the leader takes God into his own hands and causes his people to follow him. That's what is happening with Warren Jeffs now, and what happened with David Koresh's and Jim Jones' followers. It's best if the people of both country ignore their leaders' religious words.
2006-09-03 15:30:24 · answer #3 · answered by alnitaka 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is my opinion that they are both just as bad, visions is one thing but to actually say you talk to god!!! Christian or not, don't matter what religion you are from, whether you think you speak to our created in which ever shape, color or form; keep it to yourself. Visions sent by god is a tricky way of mis leading. Just about everyone can say they have or have had visions of something, don't get me wrong I myself do believe in a creator, but a vision, not yet maybe later. Good luck
2006-09-03 15:25:56 · answer #4 · answered by Halcon 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I put my trust in God first and GW second, between the three characters in your question. I'd never trust the Muslim nor would I put any other God before my God. Comprendo?
2006-09-03 16:42:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Without knowing the exact address of God, all letters mailed to Him are dead letters.
Fanatic leaders USE God to keep the herd of sheep together.
The sheep get fleeced and frequently get cooked for meat.
The Satan laughs...
2006-09-03 15:32:10 · answer #6 · answered by spiritualseeker 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if the fiscal conservatives would stop inserting their belief system into politics, everybody in the world would be safer,, this is AMERICA for gods sake,,,,,,,,,,,,
2006-09-03 15:22:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
http://www.prophetofdoom.net/quotes.aspx?g=405&i=4531
2006-09-03 15:29:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The one with more power is the scarier.
2006-09-03 15:24:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't vote for either
2006-09-03 15:24:46 · answer #10 · answered by anonacoup 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋