2006-09-03 11:36:57 · 17 answers · asked by SimplyMe 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I don't.
I'd much prefer not to have a dual party government (I don't like a lot of Republican politicians, and a lot of the Democrats are...not very effective leaders.) I think it's one of the reasons there is so much of a division over politics in america to date.
Other than that I try to pretend that there is someone more competant in office than this latest politician outof a run of them in the last decade or so.
2006-09-03 12:07:32 · answer #1 · answered by kxaltli 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I do not think that the George W. Bush and his current administration is not doing a very good job. I think he is
handling everything very badly.
In the areas of dealing with the Wars in Iraq and Afganistan too
many soliders and civilians keep on dying.
We are again in Hurricane Season and the damage done from
Hurricane Katrina has been slow moving and will probably take
many many years to recover.
2006-09-03 12:02:19 · answer #2 · answered by Michele T 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that George Bush started out with a lot of charisma and drive in the very beginning of his time as president, the sort of thing that would have made me respect him if i was older (i was about 7 at the time). Now, though, his decisions involving the Iraq war and abortion and important issues like that are rash and unintelligent. i am not a god believer, nor a republican, so i dislike his decisions, but even the tiny conservative part of me thinks that the ideas he has are preeetty stupid.
2006-09-03 11:46:55 · answer #3 · answered by Libby G 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
While I am seriously 'disenchanted' with how the current administration is handling the war, I am absolutely certain that the war was necessary. The Democrats have no plan not only on how to pursue the war but on how they plan to get out!, and as a result, their constant sniping serves no national purpose. At this point, on this issue, we have the choice between a bad plan and no plan whatsoever.
Some choice! But at this point, I will select the bad plan over no plan at all. The opposition to the war has had 4 years to come up with an effective plan and they haven't done so. To me, that is a strong indication that they won't have one if they take the Whitehouse. They will wilt under any outside pressure on this issue.
2006-09-03 11:51:06 · answer #4 · answered by glenbarrington 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I think he's not a popularly elected leader. He is also a national populist (goes against popular decisions including polls). It's no longer a democracy to have a non-popular leader. Just that the system of politics in America is heavily flawed. The democrats have no power whatsoever and so they can't vie to have a non-confidence vote on Bush like in Canada.
2006-09-03 11:39:44 · answer #5 · answered by mack C 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sure wooly bully. That surplus that the Democrats left behind had to be cleaned up. We also had too many young men in this country before the war cleaned up that problem.
2006-09-03 12:06:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The first word that comes to mind is not allowed on Yahoo! Answers.
2006-09-03 11:38:15 · answer #7 · answered by Fadi P 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Doing a fair job. They had to clean up the mess the Democraps created. I don't believe they are watching out for the low and middle class.
2006-09-03 11:43:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
All of the bleeding heart liberals can kiss my bleep. The man has done nothing but take us through a war, cut our taxes, and tell us the truth. You may not like it, but the man has done his job. Is he the best? No. But he is good - and good is good enough
2006-09-03 11:43:42 · answer #9 · answered by jgcii 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
that's easy..... bush,rumsfeld lying *** dick the prick cheney and anyone else thinks them crackas are doing a good job.they done nothing but .... up and people are tired of they bullshit.
2006-09-03 11:52:14 · answer #10 · answered by kobe 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋