Is USC a dyansty even though they lost in the Rose Bowl to texas?

Answer 1

How can you be a dynasty if you get you *** spanked in the biggest game of the year?

Answer 2

Yes. This team has won 46 out of their last 48 games. They won two straight national championships and played Texas last year as the favorite to win last year. Of course too much Vince Young put an end to USC's bid to win 3 straight. This is a dynasty and it looks like this year is going to be another very good one. The Pac 10 looks like it will present no problems to USC again this year. Notre Dame is probably the only potential loss for the Men of Troy this year. It is hard to find flaws with this team year after year.

Answer 3

I wouldnt consider them a dyansty yet, if they win 2 or 3 more in the next few seasons, then yes. But they better look out for the Ducks baby!!

Answer 4

They have been a dynasty for years, even though they didn't win too many championships. So many great players came out of USC and that is why they are a dynasty.

Answer 5

NEWS FLASH!!!! NEWS FLASH!!!! The University of Texas won the Rose Bowl and the 2005 National Championship. They have a 21 game winning streak. U.S.C. won 1 outright national championship and shared another. Auburn never had a chance to play for one of U.S.C.'s titles. The same Auburn whose D-coordinator is the one who beat U.S.C. with Texas.

Answer 6

Yes they are. They may have lost but they still played for it. Of course I'd like to see that dynasty end this year but they're off to a great start.

Answer 7

for now, call then a dynasty in decline. But that game against Arkansas showed they are definately still in the title hunt.

Answer 8

USC is dirt! Dirt you hear me! Alabama is/was a dynasty. UCLA in basketball - USC???? Give me a break!

Answer 9

Who cares?

Answer 10

I don';t like em...but yes they are