English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-03 11:19:51 · 4 answers · asked by James007 2 in Social Science Psychology

4 answers

No, Ted Bundy was apparently free from mental and physical abuse both as a child and an adult though he didn't have a normal childhood by any means. Because his father was not around, Ted and his mother lived with her grandparents where the family told neighbors and friends that Ted was the adopted brother of his mother (which some people think Ted actually believed for most of his childhood). I'm sure there are others like Ted Bundy with no direct evidence of abuse or victimization but none comes to my mind. There are murderers who are victims of abuse and also victims of neurological disorders (such as brain tumors) that doctors and psychiatrists associate with murderous intent and/or homicidal tendencies. They are not victims in the sense that the people that they kill are victims, but they can fit under the definition of "victim."

2006-09-03 11:24:53 · answer #1 · answered by corbeyelise 4 · 0 0

I think this is so...apart from severe mental illness, brain damage and the like .a cover all saying would be .....

Hurt people Hurt others....in these cases to a fatal degree.

2006-09-03 18:57:00 · answer #2 · answered by Vivian X 3 · 0 0

No, especially not people who kill for money.

2006-09-03 18:25:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

not always, some of them are possesed

2006-09-03 21:21:00 · answer #4 · answered by RENE H 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers