English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-03 11:12:42 · 5 answers · asked by lilallyson05 1 in Sports Football (American)

5 answers

No. Kentucky is not very talented or deep, Louisville is. I'm a Kentucky fan who is fed up with the inferior product put on the field year after year. Brooks is over the hill. He should have been dismissed after last year, but it seems like 3 wins a year is just fine with way too many UK fans. I'm sorry but I still remember the brief "glory days" when Coach Curci won the SEC championship (although Curci tended to recruit thugs). Kentucky has a long,long way to go to get to the level where Louisville already is. Anything is possible on the field, and Kentucky could win today. But the chances are really remote unless Louisville simply hands the game to them. That is not likely. I'm actually hoping UK loses so badly and so often early that fans begin clamoring for Brooks to go. That is the first step to potential respectability if UK goes out and finds an exciting coach who can get things moving in the right direction and at least field a competitive team that has a reasonable chance to win 6 or 7 games a year.

2006-09-03 12:03:03 · answer #1 · answered by perdidobums 5 · 0 0

Very little as Louisville is a ranked team with a lot of talent. If they play their hearts out and play smart, they have a chance. I would pick Louisville about 38-21

2006-09-03 11:50:46 · answer #2 · answered by toughguy2 7 · 0 0

HI,,,, i seriously dobut it,,, Louisville has a real good team.....

Good luck

2006-09-03 11:17:35 · answer #3 · answered by eejonesaux 6 · 0 0

OF COURSE THEY HAVE A *chance*, OTHERWISE WHY WOULD THEY PLAY?

2006-09-03 11:17:05 · answer #4 · answered by work_thenplay 3 · 0 0

nope

2006-09-03 11:14:02 · answer #5 · answered by mister w 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers