was just reading in todays newspaper were actress jennifferr aniston sues a photographer who got toples photoes of the actress, bye using a telephoto lens and getting naughty photograpys of her topless or barely dreseed. would you sue someone if they were secretly filming taking photos of you and you were in owne home if you was in the buf etc?/ and you found out about what would you do??
2006-09-03 10:30:04 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
If you are out in public you are fair game but if you are inside in a supposedly private area you shouldn't have to worry about that sort of thing.
There are peeking tom laws
I would sue their asses off and get the police involved to get them put away
2006-09-03 10:36:02 · answer #1 · answered by Karce 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
usually folks who are photographed like that want to be photographed like that or they wouldn't have been that irresponsible in the first place. Sure when you're young you might make a mistake, but by the time you're jennifers age and famous, you know better - that is - if you didn't want someone to do it.
Jennifer is not suing for invasion of privacy, she is suing for the publicity - fighting to get her name above the other big mamas in the tabloids. It's all one big hen fight and it's all in the timing. The next celebrity would happily knock Jennefer of the top with HER boobs if she can plan it just right.
2006-09-03 10:31:49 · answer #2 · answered by waplambadoobatawhopbamboo 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If a photographer could take many snaps mean the actors are giving the opportunity to take them and in turn to get the publicity out of it.
I do not think they are losing anything by getting photographed topless or even totally nude, dont they do in movies?
It is all drama man!!!!!!!!
2006-09-03 10:33:03 · answer #3 · answered by Eyedoc 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Happens all the time - mere publicity stunt.
I'm starting to get tired with Ms. Anniston's antics. I'm starting to see again that she isn't all that, just as she wasn't all that when she first appeared on Friends.
2006-09-03 10:35:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh well. What's done is done. They'll be on the internet in less than 24 hours anyway. Stuff gets around fast online.
2006-09-03 10:35:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
actors/actresses are Famous.. they Know the public/paperazzi wants to see them.. in all kinds of situations. I would recommend to Jennifer.. next time you're dressing, don't do it on your back porch! or at least close the blinds! like omg!
2006-09-03 10:31:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would do as Jennifer is doing, they are public persons but reporters must understand the limits of their profession.
2006-09-03 10:31:19 · answer #7 · answered by petelephant 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course
2006-09-03 18:13:48 · answer #8 · answered by 120 IQ 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes i would..that is a very pervert photographer..and sue him infront of the Media (on TV) too....and if i even found who it was..i'll go to court and sue him/her their..so that him/her goes to jail
2006-09-03 11:06:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
That is absolutely an invasion of privacy. It is also morally wrong. She should sue.
2006-09-03 10:32:07 · answer #10 · answered by WEIRDRELATIVES 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋