2006-09-03 10:00:27 · 18 answers · asked by This_Is_Me 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
they definitely used that as an excuse to justify the war,but if the US attacked their own people to force a war that would have to be the lowest of the low.there are things that aren't right about it tho,and it makes me wonder,but we are unlikely to ever know the truth.all we can do is look at the facts and how many people died that day to reflect the poor state of the world these days.
2006-09-03 10:07:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes.dick cheney was the mastermind.i mean you got a guy no wants one in office but he steals the first election and they had saggin numbers to boot.so to unite the country why not order a hit in 3 locations and blame some one else to make yourself look good?good frame job dick cheney.if people will recall it was dick cheney who was moved to a secret location before the towers were struck.his puppet bush was in ny city where the attack took place in a classroom to protect his albi and he tried to play off when the first tower was struck that he didnt know anything.ladies and gentleman this dumb *** wasnt acting.plus at 9-15 am in dc why didnt cheney order military planes to intercept the planes?because it would mess up the plan and throw a loop in their plans .so cheney ordered the near by millitary not to intercept.he called it a drill.but their plan was unfolding right before their eyes.in dc were cheney was the plane hit the pentagon and they claim it was a dc 47 that struck the side of the pentagon but a plane that big would have made alot mess in the captiol building and the front lawn.plus blame the saudis. bush's business partners.they must have made a bad deal where bush must have cheated them out of money or halliburton owned by cheney must owe them billions more. plus it was a true fact that bush was looking to invade iraq before 9-11 for more poltical gain and to own the gas over there by overthrowning saddam hussein by saying he did not comply by un sanctions.first of all when you lose a war in 1991 you're not thinking revenge.hussein disarmed all the weapons when bill clinton was elected in 1992 and the u.n reports said he disarmed all his wmds after the gulf war.
2006-09-03 12:45:36 · answer #2 · answered by kobe 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just to poin out, the first WTC attacks were litrally paid for by our FBI. The guy who was planning it and in charge of the terrorists was told it was a sting operation. He actually recorded the FBI officials telling him go through with it.
So, about the same people ast he first one. You are right. Our government again.
2006-09-03 14:45:18 · answer #3 · answered by cat_Rett_98 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, 9/11 was bin laden's work but this does not cancel the fact that the Bush administration abused that incident to suck money for the military sake and do Afghanistan and Iraq. There has to be justifications for the American people and bin laden offered these justifications on a silver plate to Bush. Hence, the question should be: whose side is Bin laden on?
2006-09-03 10:14:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, it was the same group that tried to take down the towers in 1993 but failed. This time, they used bigger bombs.
What they are doing to nations all over the world definitely justifies war against them.
2006-09-03 10:02:53 · answer #5 · answered by speakeasy 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
NO, of course not. In spite of all the lies, it was almost definately Bin Laden and those folks who did it. A close aqauintace of mine was on one of the jets that crashed in to the world trade center. He was a nice and smart person, he owed me a bottle of wine. It brought the whole scenario home for me. Actual person I knew, killed out of spite for something he had nothing to do with. I'm not sure what was or wasn't justified in response by our government. Its understandable to me though that some sort was justified.
2006-09-03 10:06:30 · answer #6 · answered by kurticus1024 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
There are just so many erroneous assumptions in this question that I just don't know how to answer it. Has any logical thoughts put into the questioning, or any efforts toward understanding the world that we exist in?
Flabbergasted, XR
2006-09-03 10:13:07 · answer #7 · answered by XReader 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I posed a question recently : ' Why do so many fools buy into this childish 9/11 conspiracy nonsense?'
That's the question you should be asking.
2006-09-03 10:19:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The CIA has been doing things like that for a long time. Check the CIA website on operation AJAX
https://www.cia.gov/csi/studies/vol48no2/article10.html
2006-09-03 10:08:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
If that were the case why use Saudis as the "scapegoat" terrorists. Why not use Iraqs or Afganistanis?
2006-09-03 10:04:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋