What examples, news clips or statements compel the conclusion that the Iraq war is just or unjust?

Question

what's out there that would convince me either way on it's own merits?

Answer 1

After Saddam started a multi-national war by invading Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, he was driven back and was allowed a temporary cease-fire in which he was mandated to hand over all his WMD.

The latest report to Congress explains that so far, over 500 chemical munitions shells have been found that were hidden from the UN inspectors. We also found nuclear enrichment centrifuge parts as well as biological samples for bio-weapons hidden in a scientist's kitchen.

Saddam is guilty as charged. Ending the cease-fire is completely just.

We are now helping Iraq's legitimate government, elected by its people, to stop Islamists from taking over the country. Saddam had to fight those same Islamists, hence his well-known record for 'brutality' against 'his own people'. To this day, Leftists in America insist those Islamists are Iraq's 'own people' despite the fact that they are rebels attempting to overthrow the government. Leftists cannot seem to grasp that they are enemies of the nation, not its peaceful civilian population. So, the continued fighting, in support of Iraq's legitimately elected government, is also just.

We will do our duty according to Geneva Convention and provide security forces until that Government's own military and police are able to handle it on their own.

Answer 2

Technically, i'm not sure that's. that's not something like conflict interior the time-honored experience, yet extra of an excellent cluster ****. The U.S. protection tension in Iraq is struggling with a guerrilla conflict on multiple fronts against any style of sects, tribes, terrorist communities, and insurrgencies who's individuals are indistinguishable from, because of the fact they ofen are, basic voters. Bush gave such numerous ever changing motives for the U.S. invasion that I lost track. the main compelling clarification for the invasion on the time of the invasion became the possibility of a mushroom cloud, or in different words, a nuclear attack initiated by ability of Saddam Hussein against the U.S. the perfect wingers will factor to all the Demcrats and different countries who reported at fairly some situations that there have been W.M.D.s in Iraq. this might properly be a great cop out. As President of the U. S. Bush's purely criminal duty became to hearken to the comments of his very own intelligence companies and the U.N. inspectors. The U.N. comments besides as those of all sixteen of the intelligence companies below Bush of course reported that Saddam did no longer have nuclear weapons nor the flexibility to lead them to. Bush became advised this back and back earlier his administrations "mushroom cloud" references, which will enhance the question of why U.S. troops have been fairly sent to Iraq. there have been no placed up invasion plans. The reason of the U.S. invasion, judging by ability of the outcomes, looks to have been to create as lots chaos in Iraq as obtainable. back, one has to ask why? To this date the targets for Iraq, a minimum of as far because of the fact the media is worried quantity to a imprecise connection with victory with out sparkling explaination of what that would mean or how that would desire to look. Getting Iraq to that's pre invasion stability nevertheless sounds like it would be a protracted, steep, uphill climb extraordinarily because of the fact that lots of the individuals qualified to make it take place have been killed or fled the country. Unjust conflict? extensive mistake? complicated and inscrutable conspiracy? I want it have been that straightforward. i'm not sure we will ever understand in basic terms what that's. 4,000 U.S. protection tension and over one hundred,000 Iraqi civilian lives sounds like a severe cost to pay for some thing i don't comprehend.

Answer 3

People can say whatever they want to. Saddam Hussein and the country of Iraq were no more a threat to the US than Greenland is. If you want to start talking about bad leaders of countries, Saddam was pretty far down the list compared to many others (North Korea for one). Iraq had no part in 9/11, they were no threat to America as far as WMD's. The majority of the fighting going on over there is between Shiites & Sunni's. Both Republicans and Democrats ok'd us to invade. That's past history. It's time to quit blaming and focus on getting our troops home.

Answer 4

When you are at peace with yourself in a day and at the same time a guy is raping someone in iraq but everyone just said o-well that's over there so what, would that be ok with you to know and if you also knew that people in the military could do something about it, wouldn't that in fact be the right thing to do, knowing that the military wants to fight anyway because it is what they do.

Answer 5

Look at the effect US occupation has had over the past two years, since "Mission Accomplished". Look at the fact that the Iraqi death toll is over 2000 per month. Ask yourself if the US presence is helping the situation at all.

Answer 6

The un could not enforce any of it's own resolutions Somebody had to take the lead!!!