Jon Bonet Ramsey?

Question

I think this case was pure jealousy one parents against the other parents, and a couple of affairs thats been envolved here, And i really feel that John Mark Karr is covering up alot of people , who was envolved in this, They gave him the money to shut up, And he lied his way through, talk to the husbands lover and dig deep

Answer 1

JMK wasn't in CO when JBR was murdered.

Salacious and defamatory allegations against one or both of the Ramseys serve no purpose but to titillate those who aren't interested in justice: there is no connection whatsoever between the death of JBR and any consensual affairs that the Ramseys might or might not have had.

There was reason to believe JMK was a political smokescreen for the GOP, as his "story" took the media's attention off all the bad news for the Bush regime for almost 2 weeks; however, it looks more now like it was just something that conveniently fell into their proverbial laps.

JMK is at best quite odd, and there is reason to suggest he ought to be monitored. When JMK was taken into custody, 2 thoughts immediately surfaced:

(1) he is an intelligence agent of the US government (which may or may not be true; if it is, we'll never know); and

(2) he would have been willing to say anything to get out of a Thai prison. Thailand is notorious for its maltreatment of prisoners and detainees. To reasonably ensure extradition, JMK knew he'd have to make it worthwhile for US authorities -- so he picked the JBR case.

Ostensibly, however, JMK had been obsessed witht he JBR case (and with the Polly Klaas case) for quite some time -- which may explain the material for which the warrants were issued in CA:

JMK probably began with the delusion that he was going to help solve the case, and he began working from a theory that involved child molestation. To better understand child molestation, he acquired material that would help him to imagine either the scene or the circumstances (etc.) or some combination of those characteristics of the crime.

His obsession then drove him to imaginary musings of the murderer(s): he tried to "get inside the head" of her killer(s) -- and that ultimately led him to the delusion that he's guilty; hence, the "confession."

As presented in this theoretical account, there was never any actual criminal intent on the part of JMK. And that leads us to the doctrine of sovereign immunity: should profilers and investigators and other agents of the government be allowed to possess child porn, so long as they claim it is only used for official purposes?

One might argue if that helps them catch a killer, it should be allowed. But what of lay investigators? At what point is flouting the law in the interest of enforcing a greater law no longer okay?

Does it depend on results? If JMK had found JBR's killer, and he relied on knowledge gained from exposure to child porn in order to do that, would we say his use of child porn should be excused? If we do, then what if that was his intent, but he wasn't successful?

Similarly, if the investigators or cops (etc.) have obtained or accessed child porn as a part of their investigation into the killing of JBR, do we hold them to the same standard? Is it evidence of illegal prurient interest if they have that material and don't produce the killer, and is it okay for them to have it only if they do?

I believe accountability should always be equal to responsibility: peons should be least accountable and most trusted; government agents should be most accountable and least trusted. There is no telling how many perverts are hiding behind a badge or the immunity afforded their respective offices.
.

Answer 2

John Mark Karr was a weirdo from day one. No one, other than himself, believed he was involved in this very tragic case, but he had to be brought back and formally charged before they could do the DNA analysis that proved he was nowhere near the site at the time of the murder.
The true tragedy is that people like you are still looking at the parents - there has been pretty exhaustive investigation, and nothing has confirmed that either of them had anything to do with it. It is truly sad that JonBenet's mother died before the case was solved.

Answer 3

captain freaky high pants and freaky michael jackson could be twins, with so much incommon.. one wants 2 be a girl and the other wants 2 look like a girl.. 2 pea's in a pod... and Ramsey went into hidding.. wonderful.. and as someone said Sylvia Browne has 2 be a fake or she would say who the killer is..

Answer 4

Ok John Mark, get off the computer and stop being obsessed with Jon Benet.

Answer 5

I don't know what the hell you're talking about, let this poor kid and her mother rest in Peace, God can sort it out now.

JMK was a freak who did a false confession, end of story. Just like 200 other people when she was killed.

There were 16 other children killed in this country the same day as her............name one of them.

Answer 6

He is obviously not as "insane" and dumb as everyone is portraying him as!! He just figured he had a great bank account coming to him after he confessed and the book deals and movie deals started rolling in!! He is out for profit I think!!

Answer 7

this whole case is getting on my nerves. who cares anymore. there is a whole lot of other dead kids out there and no one is making a big deal about their death. this whole thing just needs to be buried like that poor little girl.

Answer 8

Why would he confess now...not before

Answer 9

Dead, gone, over, killer dead, non story.