or would you not vote for him, simply because you simply have not realized the outright depravity and utter wrongness of homosexuality.
2006-09-03 06:41:16 · 13 answers · asked by jackoff.buddy 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
The pro-gay lifestyle group immediately jump on the Askers back. If you honour the rights of the homosexual why on earth do you not honour the rights of the person who disagrees with the lifestyle. So you say it is natural. That is your opinion and you are fully entitled to say so. Likewise the Asker has the right to say he disagrees with it. Or is it a case, love me, love my dog. (Apologies for the analogy). I happen to be totally opposed to male homosexuality. I understand fully how two men can love each other. Perfectly normal and indeed natural to here. However, sodomy is totally abhorrent to my nature. Does that not make it totally unnatural on my side of the fence. As for the other aspects of gay 'love', no one will ever convince me that it is natural. Call it a preferred lifestyle for some, by all means but totally unnatural to me. I am heterosexual by nature and by choice, I could if I wished practice homosexual acts. However, that is beside the point, I have never considered it, I have no intention of considering it and will never consider it. Finally, I think that it is grossly unfair of those who answer with calls of 'homophobic' etc., because someone states their views on any subject, especially if it is an honest and truthful viewpoint.
2006-09-03 06:57:38 · answer #1 · answered by thomasrobinsonantonio 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Wow that a doublesided evil question. I would not vote for a gaybasher because its wrong to judge someone by their sexual preference.And im a democrat so that would never happen anyway that I would vote for a republican.I may go green party though. Ive seen alot of people say they would vote green if they thought they had a chance of winning.
2006-09-03 06:43:27 · answer #2 · answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No I would not vote a "gaybasher" into public office. This isn't the 1950's, gays and lesbians are human beings who deserve the same rights that you and I have. Period.
2006-09-03 06:47:12 · answer #3 · answered by carpediem 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no because you think 'gaybashers' are morally superior?
wow we should go back to burning christians for torches like emperer nero did
who are you to chasitise love be it between anything you think your "god" would hate them even though he "loves" all his children
your believes are completely antiquanted and the were a way to seperate your selves from the romans who attacked early christains get over yourself and stop attacking people who have done you no wrong
what was that saying from your "holy" book
judge not least ye be judged
dont think your morally superior just 'cause you have faith in an outdated belief
for blind faith is outright depraved and utterly wrong
2006-09-03 06:48:53 · answer #4 · answered by Alrin 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First of all, that politician should quit peeking in other people's windows. It is not HIS business what people are doing in their own bedrooms.
Secondly, I would never vote for someone who is openly prejudiced against ANY group. Those in government must keep their predisposed judgements out of the public eye and out of their opinions. They are elected to govern ALL the people and not just those he agrees with.
The good of the MANY outweighs the rights of the one.
2006-09-03 06:51:38 · answer #5 · answered by loryntoo 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would absolutely not vote for them, and I'm choosing to ignore the extraordinarily ignorant part of the question.
2006-09-03 06:47:14 · answer #6 · answered by calculusheyhey 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Helllllllllll NO gay bashing is not funny and I would never help to put some one like that in office.
2006-09-03 06:48:06 · answer #7 · answered by dorrie11206 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
there's nothing wrong with being gay. and you're a homophobe, not cool. being gay is clearly natural and normal.
no, i wouldn't elect someone like that into office. but ignorant gay bashers are elected into office all the time.
2006-09-03 06:43:26 · answer #8 · answered by N/A 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
hi no! first of all, I relish my privateness and 2d why interior the worldwide might every physique desire to difficulty themselves to each and all of the crap that is going on in politics. i would not run for public workplace if somebody gave me 1000000000 money.
2016-10-01 06:29:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would not vote for he as he is a divider. That is not the hallmark of a leader
2006-09-03 06:46:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋