Should we do away with public schools in the US? Should we privatize K-12 education?

Question

Do you think the private sector would do a better job of educating kids than our current system of government run (public) education? Would it be accessible to all?

Answer 1

NOOOOOOO!!!
Are you nuts!?

oo and also.. how would that work? If every school was private, woudlnt that make it public in a way.!? All that would do would be to make parents pay more for their childs education and possibley make them wear uniforms, or go to an "all-girls" or "all-boys" school - which limits how they grow and get along with the opposite sex. (whether good or bad) I know I get along with guys better, and im a girl, not because of sexual reason but because of our interests and stuff. I find most girls annoying in a sence.

Answer 2

YES! The U.S government spends more on education than any other country, yet we aren't even in the top ten of education results. By removing all funds to public education, parents would save enough money on taxes to choose where their child is educated. Along with this choice, we'd solve all problems of education that are attatched to it being connected to the government, such as prayer, dress code, freedom of speech vs responsibility of speech, the list goes on and on. Another plus is that the teacher's unions would no longer have a stranglehold on the system and stop stealing away the money meant for America's children, all the unions care about is creating more and more profitable jobs for the teachers, the actual educating is a secondary objective at most. The list of pros to this issue go on ad infinitum, yet the only arguement the goverment and teacher's unions have against this is a smokescreen of propaganda stating that privitization will "hurt our children". There's a reason that private schools can do more with their children with a smaller buget than public schools can.

Answer 3

I absolutely do. Taking your child's education out of the government's hands would be a great thing. It can't seem to make a trip to the toilet in the dark without tripping over it's own feet. Education hasn't been a government focus for a long long time. Add to that, today's educational programs are inferior. Many school officials seem to be on a power trip, turning our youth into weenies who will fail in the real world. Additionally, officials restrict the rights and freedoms of children that aren't excited to be in the mainstream. They fail at dealing with children who are disabled or have challenging behaviors. Our current employees are not screened thoroughly. And, some schools are attempting to punish children for things that happen outside school walls.

Here in Denver a private company works for the department of social services as a contractor. It answers major questions for customers, handles payments and applications for aid, and outsourcing for technology. This company has a standard that allows their employees to get raises for performance. This company handles thousands of contracts. One of their contracts is taking orders for fast food restuarants. Their call center is half a world away. They have already begun the process of running health care contracts, and even education contracts in a few states. Contractors can be versitile,

Contractors would be held directly responsible for the terms in their contracts. My husband's company is responsible for taking a certain percentage of all calls and a certain level of satisfaction for customers. If they fail to hold up to their end of the contract, they lose money. Fail too many times, they lose that contract. If teachers are working for a private contractor, then they would be held to the terms of that contract. If they fail to perform well, they do not get to keep their jobs. The contractors also negotiate for health care benefits, can garner cheaper supplies and text books, standardize the grade levels, and check progress more regularly than government driven education programs. We could see a lot of great strategic alliances that cheapen the cost of education and regulate the standards of education on a nation wide level. Imagine, being able to buy stock from the corporation that educates your child. Not having to worry about what kind of teacher your child has, not having to worry about what your child is learning even if you have to relocate, not having to worry that the cost of textbooks or supplies, or even what your child is having for lunch. Complaints against a teacher would be taken seriously, and would effect that teacher's performance based pay raise. I can't think of a single situtation that couldn't be regulated by a good contractor.

Answer 4

they might not. Conservatives who desire to close down public colleges could desire to long for the days in the previous the known public college equipment began. you be responsive to, back while purely the privileged type could desire to get an training and the destructive have been illiterate? Vouchers may be ineffective to the destitute. abode-education might additionally be ineffective using fact getting the materials mandatory for abode-education expenses various money; if cons whinge approximately tax money going to public colleges, it is not clever for them to push this on account that tax money might could desire to pass in direction of helping the destructive get the materials they could desire to income at abode. So taxes might could desire to be raised to disguise those expenses. And cons do certainly not desire to pay attention approximately tax hikes, even while this is a few thing that could desire to be valuable to the society. this is the two that or only enable the destructive proceed to be ignorant. long tale short, it would pass against each thing we stand for to abolish public education. each and every person merits the suited to an training.

Answer 5

public schools offer education for EVERYONE, having only private schools would send the message that you need to be wealthy to gain an education and that is not in accordance with the American spirit. no one needs to be rich in order to succeed or have an education.

Answer 6

Sure that would free up $billions$ for private investors.

And screw the kids most are fat idiots anyway.


Go big Red Go

Answer 7

Of course, and use the money we'd normally use to pay for public schools! So I don't have to pay for drop-outs!


One problem. The liberal mass will never agree.

Answer 8

No, poor children would have no access to education and a even larger disparity than is now evident will be realized.

Answer 9

Absolutely. Competition would force schools to improve.

http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-pOypG0szd7Pv_X1rQxw_4qCWpA--?cq=1&p=165

Answer 10

no way. jose. Although being a "corporate" america, this would be considered socialism.