English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

or is it something more sinister?

http://www.patriotsaints.com/News/911/Conspiracy/Bush/images/bush_911nypost.jpg

2006-09-03 02:52:24 · 30 answers · asked by Informed Liberal 1 in Politics & Government Politics

30 answers

...not only was he warned, the fbi agents that were investigating some of the supposed hijackers were told to back off and drop it .. some of them have even tried to sue because of that ... this was supposedly because they needed the "patsies" in place to take the rap ... and if it was incompetence then so was the fact that no planes were launched to intercept any of the hijacked planes in the hour or so the attacks were happening ...this is a STANDARD procedure ... and if it was incompetence then why was nobody fired, courtmartialed, demoted, or punished? Bush is guilty of high treason against the united states of america and needs to be publicly executed for directly aiding and abetting enemies of our country and for being responsible directly for the deaths of over 3000 american citizens on sept 11, 2001

2006-09-03 03:19:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 5

Prior to this moment, I knew there were a few people who we could classify as "Sheeple". Now I've learned that the term applies to a lot more people than I could possibly imagine.

T Time and John h keep forgetting that Bin Laden was handed to BJ Bill on a silver platter. A platter which was refused.

Juno is simply beging to wear a berka because they're oh, so sexy. Apples isn't even smart enough to answer the question; much less post anything rational. As for Helga's garbage conspiracy theory? Apparently someone's never heard of photoshop. If I go and add a fuzzy image of King Kong climbing the WTC and have him reach into the hole the plane caused and start pulling out imaginary people and begin eating them, guess who would be the first to believe it? That's right.... Helga J!!!

Bobby D, NONAME, DeuceRider, and DiamondK are the ones who have a clue in all of this. You can know that an attack is going to happen, but if you don't know everything about it, there's nothing you can do against it. Perhaps we should have 24-hr patrol flights of F-16's over our skies who have orders to shoot anything suspicious?

Bottom line, Bush knew a little, but not enough to follow through on.

2006-09-03 03:29:10 · answer #2 · answered by peacemastr 1 · 3 0

He knew?

You mean he was warned and KNEW that on 9/11 that there would be 4 planes that were going to be hijacked. Two of those planes were going to fly into the twin towers? Another of those planes was going to fly into the Pentagon? He was warned the 4th plane was going to attempt to hit another target yet to be determined? You mean he was warned and had enough details to stop this from happening??

REALLY?

Or is it (as the headline of that paper says) that the "Prez was warned of "possible" hijackings before terror attacks". Key word here being "possible".

What makes you think he had enough information to stop those attacks from occuring?

What exactly would you have done to stop those attacks from occuring? I mean, it sure sounds like you believe it was possible after all you are above being a pinnacle of incompetence.

What is incompetent is a person who passes on a headline in a newspaper (meant to sell newspapers) as being the absolute truth. You are a fool...

2006-09-03 03:38:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Your best reference is a only a New York tabloid that claims, after the deed was done, that President Bush was warned of possible "highjackings" So what? Nobody knew where. Nobody knew when. Nobody knew how. What was George Bush supposed to do? Bill Clinton let the high-jackers into our country and let them plan the job and take flight training here.

Bill Clinton, America's most anti-gun president in history, did nothing to provide armed air marshals or to arm the flight decks, either of which could have stopped the terrorist high-jackings. Taurus Firearms of BRAZIL thought enough of the need for armed flight decks that they offered to provide a free .38 special revolver to any American flight deck officer that wanted one and could get permission to carry it aboard. The Democrats and the airlines fought this and are still fighting it (the airlines for fear of lawsuits). Even so, armed air marshals and some armed flight deck officers are now in place, under the Bush Administration.

2006-09-03 03:17:01 · answer #4 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 3 1

I would call it arrogance but I'm not ruling out incompetence. American thought it was so powerful and so respected that nothing like that would ever happen to us. If I were president and I received a memo in my daily briefing titled "Osama Bin Laden determined to attack inside the United States." It would raise some flags and I would try to find out what it all means. It's easy for me to say that now that the attacks have come and gone, but think about it. It's pre 9/11, you're at peace, and all previous attempts on US soil have had very little success. What would you do if you were President. America, before 9/11 was the most powerful country in the world and we took it for granted. How many times have you heard people say that would never happen to us? Were they wrong. Welcome to the real world.

2006-09-03 03:10:44 · answer #5 · answered by gnatlord 4 · 2 1

Bush was so adamant that evil could only come from Iraq that he was totally oblivious to anything else. Even after 9/11, he was still asking his aides to find links between Al-Quaida and Saddam Hussein.

As some have said before: "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."

2006-09-03 09:44:22 · answer #6 · answered by Vincent G 7 · 0 1

Please get your facts right and quit believing what you read on the Net. The US government had warnings for 8 years before Mr. Bush took office. What did Clinton do? You don't like that Question, do you? 9/11 would not have happened if the previous administration had done their job.

2006-09-03 03:07:07 · answer #7 · answered by SNOOP 4 · 4 1

human beings do not supply a damn approximately WHY 9/11 got here approximately. all of us be responsive to that Al-Qaida planned the mass assassination, that it maintains to devise such assaults, and that we will in no way end attacking Al-Qaida. it is one element to which Republicans and Democrats can agree. via the way, those "corrupt regimes" are additionally Muslim. How are we meant to be responsive to which Muslims are sturdy adult adult males and that are undesirable? this is a few thing which you will handle yourselves instead of burning human beings to dying for committing the crime of going to artwork interior the morning.

2016-10-01 06:20:46 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Your link says "POSSIBLE". Is that a concrete warning? Why did Clinton do NOTHING before OR after the 1993 attack? If you want a scapegoat, put the blame where it belongs!

2006-09-03 03:35:57 · answer #9 · answered by Bawney 6 · 3 0

your the pinnacle of incompetence. Clinton threw all his information away before bush got their to make him look bad. Clinton knew about it his whole time in office

2006-09-03 03:02:52 · answer #10 · answered by onefatwhiteguy 2 · 5 1

fedest.com, questions and answers