I think that people lose the whole point of the government stance here! The government in the UK are not as stupid as some believe and do "see" into the future (they were probably aware that the islamist threat was well under way even all those years ago). Imagine how difficult it would have made things if Diana was allowed to give the future King of England a Muslim half brother or sister.
"ooohh - you heartless basta*d" I hear lots of you shout but stop and think about this for a second. Islamic law (which they are lobbying for the inclusion of now I might add) advocates stoning gays, femail oppression and the actual killing of "infidels" ie: Jews and Christians - I know that the Muslims out there (and their bestest buddies the Guardian reading pseudo socialsts) are gnashing their teeth at that statement saying "oh no we/they dont" but you all KNOW that they do. The Israeli crisis recently was a symptom of this hatred. The simple fact of the matter is that the only real threat to the west at the moment is an islamic one - the muslim council in Britain have recently admited that over 40% of British muslims (now there is a contradiction in terms - hardliners say that they are muslims who happen to live in Britain, NOT British muslims - check this out - its all true and there for all to read!) actively agree with the hardliners (read terrorists!) islamic stance - 40% thats huge!! AND thats just the ercentage that admit to their true feelings.
Diana was a beautiful, complex, flawed person but forcing muslim royalty on the British public could not have been allowed. I personaly dont agree with the methodoligy (for gods sake who would?) but I can see why it happened.
2006-09-03 01:37:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by heath 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
As fascinating as it might be to think of a conspiracy theory here, I'm afraid it comes down to a driver (their driver) that had been drinking and did not maneuver the car very well and ended up killing them.
Of all the facts (or what we think are facts) in this case I find the one in which the driver was drinking on duty the most unbelievable. I mean, yes the evidence was there that he had been drinking, but it makes you wonder what was he thinking?
Whether she was pregnant or not, that I'm not sure of. It's certainly possible, but I don't imagine had she lived that it would have been disclosed until they were married.
2006-09-03 01:19:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by hvnmorefun 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
We will never know if Diana was pregnant and lets be honest who cares!
I think she was most definately bumped off through our Goverment however we will never know the truth.
For all those "non-believers" read the facts and look at the footage of the night in question. It all adds up to only one thing.
2006-09-03 01:30:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Drfoot 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
She was having a fling with Dodi. (Who wouldn't - he was worth a few bob). The chauffeur was drunk and crashed the car. Dodi's father (well known for his daft behaviour) couldn't come to terms with the death and accused MI5 and the Duke of Edinburgh of arranging it.
It's time we consigned the whole sad business to history.
2006-09-03 01:23:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes,I think that she was , if so it would have been deliberate, another way in her mind of getting back at the monarchy by giving the princes a half sibling of mixed race,as likely as not the woman was crazy and in urgent need of phsyciatric treatment, there is a strain of lunacy in the spencer family.
2006-09-03 02:54:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
. . . maybe it was a mysterious gunman on a grassy knoll, or was that Kennedy? Maybe a Muslim with a handgun, or was that the Pope (only wounded). Sorry, just can't take it seriously - a tart with two young kids at home screwing an arab at the Ritz in Paris (maybe it was James Bond but they abandoned the film because of the weak story line) . . .
2006-09-03 14:49:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Astra 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pregnant? Possible
Killed? unlikey
People die... it's sad but true
Even wealthy and popular people suffer accidents and die
It is a pretty silly way to try and kill someone, when she could have survivied (like her bodyguard) IF SHE HAD WORN HER SEATBELT !!!
(i never really understood the cult of diana - people who never knew her - weeping, people queueing for hours to sign a book of condolence......it's creepy... she was just another wealthy tart as far as I am concerned)
2006-09-03 01:19:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Vinni and beer 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
You know I was tired of the conspiarcy theorists within a year of her accident. Now I am irritated beyond.
She had a car accident and was not bright enough to put on her seatbelt. Its sad as she left two kids behind.
Thousands of people are dying and being butchered all over the world. Human rights are being trampled, people are living in fear, Europe is seeing a rise in far right politics and Nazism again and parts of former Communist held countries are worried about the possible rise of communism again.
Countires decimated by civil war and strife, right on our doorstep...
Can we please, PLEASE drop it now? She is dead, it was an accident. Enough already.
2006-09-03 01:25:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ice Queen 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think the whole thing is a bit of a mystery to be honest was it the paparatzy was it charles organising it who knows but if they do find that she was pregnant that does start some questions about whether she was murdered because the royal family certainly wouldnt be happy if they where to raise a child that isnt actually related to them dont u think
2006-09-03 01:22:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by j_squires2001 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes she was, that's why she was murdered, it's ok for prince big ears cjarles to move on eith his life but the royal family didn't like it that she had moved on. why do you think dodis father is adament to pursue this. Beacuse he is right.
2006-09-03 03:13:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by shelz042000 3
·
0⤊
0⤋