Both repuglicans and democrats would like to get rid of it as it does hamper business development. However how to replace the revenue is where they differ, the repuglicans would like to cut funds for such things as education and other important things, the democrats would like to replace it with another tax. Since bottom line the small business tax is passed down from the business to the consumer I don't see a problem with taxing the businesses in a fairer and different way. Bottom line somebody has to pay for the services that we have become accustomed to.
2006-09-03 02:08:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Michigan Democrats.
They hate small businesses.
2006-09-03 08:06:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because the big business is getting tax breaks as incentive to come here or remain here. The money to run has to come from somewhere. State government chooses to take it from those least able to have it taken. Last one out of MI please turn out the lights.
2006-09-03 08:10:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by wildmanbowling 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Because it is a small state.
2006-09-03 08:05:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Colorado 5
·
0⤊
4⤋
In Connecticut we have this rationale. If it moves, tax it, it it keeps moving, regulate it. If it stops moving, subsidize it.
2006-09-03 08:10:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by John16 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
So that DeVos can have a platform to run on.
2006-09-03 08:19:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
revenue
2006-09-03 08:31:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by playtoofast 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
If they do, it's to attract more business and more jobs.
2006-09-03 08:03:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by jackie 6
·
0⤊
4⤋