Could be safer? Probabaly a bit safer? Maybe not safer? the Iraqis are safer? This way we will catch Bin laden? Don't gamble with other peoples lives. Mr Bush says now, Bin Laden, terrorists in Iraq and Hezbolah are all the same form of new facists and we are engaged in the struggle of the century so we must make sacrifices and be patient. Who must make sacrifices?
2006-09-02 22:58:06 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
More questions..........
No. We just pis*sed them off even more.
2006-09-02 22:59:57 · answer #1 · answered by Perry N 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
again, the burden of evidence lies with the fellow making the declare for existance. i do not position self belief in god because there is not any data that he's a few thing except a made up invisible sky wizard. that is not any longer conceitedness that is elementary experience. If there's a unicorn like creature obtainable someplace it nevertheless isn't a unicorn. If there's a god like being that is nevertheless no longer god, and a good ingredient too. he's somewhat bit a bast@rd. until eventually we locate data of both they're imaginary a useless ringer for the god biblical god. No veriviable piece of information of the existance of any god has ever been produced. Ever. no longer one. The universe receives alongside basically wonderful without them.
2016-12-06 05:25:25 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, we want it the easy way...we want guaranteed results. Let's not take any chances! Let's not do anything with risk associated with it! If we just back off and follow an appeasment strategy, that will work just like it has always worked!
You want determinism? OK, now we know who must make the sacrifices... You have been chosen to sacrifice. Happy now?
2006-09-02 23:13:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Who must make sacrifices? Anyone Bush wants to control.
The entire "war on terror" (great marketing phrase) is a way to justify anything he wants. Because it is undefined and open-ended, there are no limits to what he can apply the term to.
2006-09-02 23:07:49 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
ask your self one question, "Is there one reason for the USA to keep its troops in Iraq"?
sorry one more question:"Did Bush give you one good reason for going to war there while American soldiers are killed and their families are that much worried on them and still claiming that the situation their is under control"?
if you can answer those 2 questions then your question their is answered
2006-09-03 00:19:46 · answer #5 · answered by Different 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We were no more safe now, then when we started this wild goose chase for phantom "WMDs" in 2003.
Iraq is going to cost us so dearly in the long run.
2006-09-02 23:13:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
But Mr Bush has a history of lying. He and his neonazicons have made your world decidedly more dangerous
2006-09-02 23:01:31 · answer #7 · answered by the Traveller 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Would you rather we have a war like world war 1. We did nothing then and the Brits tried to give Hitler what he wanted and we lost thousands.
2006-09-02 23:36:04 · answer #8 · answered by child_of_the_lion 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I can't believe we have survived as a country as long as we have, only to wind up with a bunch of sniveling cowards.
2006-09-02 23:53:09 · answer #9 · answered by Stand 4 somthing Please! 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Americans are dying in Iraq for NOTHING!!
2006-09-02 23:00:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Americans are dying for us.
Enlist and serve. Be a man.
2006-09-02 23:02:02 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋