2006-09-02 22:23:41 · 16 answers · asked by randy j 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Those who voted for him, most of them, don't even know what's in store for them. That he cut taxes for the very rich leaving them holding the bag: a depleted Treasury, a huge debt to China that their kids and their grandkids will have to pay back. Or else sell China on the cheap all of US industry and the best of US real estate.
Already the standard of living has fallen in the USA: downward mobility: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/30/opinion/30wed1.html
"[The] Census Bureau report for 2005 is bad news for most Americans . . . shows that median income rose 1.1 percent last year, to $46,326, the first increase since it peaked in 1999. But the entire increase is attributable to the 23 million households headed by someone over age 65. So the gain is likely from investment income and Social Security, not wages and salaries.
"For the other 91 million households, the median dropped, by half a percent, or $275. Incomes for the under-65 crowd were hurt by a decline in wages and salaries among full-time working men for the second year in a row, and among full-time working women for the third straight year. In all, median income for the under-65 group was $2,000 lower in 2005 than in 2001, when the last recession bottomed out.
"Despite the Bush-era expansion, the number of Americans living in poverty in 2005 -- 37 million -- was the same as in 2004. . . ."
2006-09-02 22:35:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only an idiot votes for George Bush.
2006-09-02 22:27:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Speaking as a soldier who is currently in Iraq, I would vote for again, no regrets, no hesitantion.
PFC Luke Robinson
2006-09-02 22:33:11 · answer #3 · answered by Hive_Tyrant_Dahashi 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I basically think of this is ironic that the spectacular did no longer have the "adequate is adequate!" approach with Bush. He for sure spent up some Benjamin storms himself. whilst it comes all the way down to the lesser of two evils.. this is a stupid analogy. Vote for the guy you help, and enable that be the tip of it. in case you do no longer help neither of the nominees, yet chosen to vote for the "lesser evil" nicely united states of america of america in case you are trying this you're no longer making a distinction in our government. Congratulations.
2016-12-18 03:59:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am more sure I voted correctly now than when He first won. Can you imagine the mess we would have with that waco Gore?
2006-09-02 23:33:06 · answer #5 · answered by child_of_the_lion 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I didn't vote for him in 2004.
2006-09-02 22:28:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
NO ,,, never took stickers off my vehicles, would most definitely vote for him again
2006-09-03 00:44:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not really. He is still better than the other choice available at the time.
2006-09-02 22:27:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
well i didnt vote so 2 POINTS FOR ME!!! george bush can suck ma COck
2006-09-02 22:28:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
NO NO NO
I would VOTE for HIM again in a HEARTBEAT!!!
2006-09-02 22:32:40 · answer #10 · answered by jennifersuem 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋