This is not always the case, but I agree it happens most of the time.
I think most fathers are happy enough to see their kids every so often, but be left free to see if that other grass is actually greener after all.
2006-09-02 22:23:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by 'Dr Greene' 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
this is not always the case many fathers out there prefer to leave a child with its mother its a very hard situation to be in and the laws are changing all the time i dont think its coz they love the kids more coz i think that fathers love the children just as much and can look after them just as good to alot of fathers work were as some mums prefer to stay home im not sure but this could be a factor in this both parents should be given the same rights
2006-09-02 22:30:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by melody3470 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i am a single Father of four , i could not imagine being without my children . my brother lost hos children at about 33 , he die prematurely from a broken heart at 45 .
A very good friend of mine is a father of five ,his children live about 600 kilometres up the road he is a chronic alcoholic , a binge drinker , become to my place often , and sits for hours just to have the company of my family .
My best friend overdosed on H after his wife left him at 33 .
The courts generally award the children to the mother , because in a society where women are equal , the men have no rights . He is seen as the bread winner , she as the care giver . this is true , women gained equal opportunity at the expense of mens rights . It is no other way .
When one has children , to be free of them is to be selfish .
Any one can father or mother a child , but it takes a Mum and or a Dad to see it through .
Put your heart out to the Fast food dads , the ones you see with their kids on weekends eating Maccas or Hungy Jacks . or at every junior sports event . Every picture tells a story .
2006-09-02 23:11:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by kevin d 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
probably because it would be better for a child to grow up with their mother. I mean, they share a bond that the father will never be able to have because the child was in the mother's womb for nine months before even being born! And it also depends on what kind of situation this child will be going home to.If the mom and dad are both capable it will probably result in joint custody.
2006-09-02 22:28:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Nemo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
you could not "fix" this on a similar time as she has the different. i'm so sorry, however the "honeymoon" era is notoriously short lived. That magnificent feeling which you will do something "i became being that guy that she needed back... the real me." is going at last, and the resentment which you are the only one making an attempt on a similar time as they "save their innovations open (save the sweetheart interior the loop with the help of staying in touch)" makes for an particularly unhappy association. it could be diverse if she became completely prepared to desert this different to furnish the marriage a truthful bypass, yet for now you're competing for her time, interest and potential and that's in simple terms not truthful. She holds each and all of the prevailing enjoying cards (has each and all of the innovations) and you sense you have none. She probably runs with this for a on a similar time as (as long as you adult males enable it) through fact its so flattering to her ego to have you ever the two battling over her, desiring her on your existence. yet its hardly flattering to you, is it? I say it rather is ulitmatium time - permit her understand she chooses one way or the different - no fence sitting, and sticks to it, or you will call it quits.
2016-11-24 19:31:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
ok--- mother here of two small children . My children's father , who is 36---we were together by the way for 8 1/2 years.....Well , we called it quits almost exactly 9 months ago . He has since paid me approximatley $200.00 to care for our two children . The only time my oldest child speaks to him , is when she calls him. He lives approx. 8 blocks form our house , and never stops by to see either of our children . He will tell my oldest one i will come and see you tomorrow when she calls him crying b/c she misses him so badly . Then when tomorrow rolls around he turns his cell off , so no one can leave any messages . Or , if he does answer he says oh baby i can't Daddy has to work today . Which only hurts her worse.... I have told him , if you don't plan on seeing her , don't tell her that you will !
Does this sound like someone who even gives a **** about thier children ?
The messed up thing is , this is how most men--- love thier children . The Mom will sit there & work two jobs , so that she can buy things for her babies. And the man will not even watch his children , while she is out there trying to support them---b/c he sure as sh-- isn't any help in that department. The mear thought , of him having to give up some of his precious money to help take care of his children---> might just send him into a killing spree. But , he thinks that she should be able to handle it all---all by herself. Never mind , that she is not the one that didn't pull out in time in the first place. Hell , she probably didn't even get to have a freakin' orgasm--- & bamm now she is stuck to take care of your fu-- up for the rest of her life. While you are out fuc-ing some nasty skank hoe.
But , girls rest easy . Because the truth is you got stuck---> with the best things that you were ever gonna get from him...... " Your Kids " And while you get to be around , for all of the cute things that they do--> he is going to miss them all! He will get his you know..... God will not look to kindly on a man who turns his back on his own children ! He won't live easy , in fact sooner or later he will probably try to crawl back to you . Be strong & don't let him ! He fuc-ed up , not you ---> let him pay for all the things that he has done ! Go out and find youself someone that will really love you , and your kids ! Someone who will actually be there for your kids , when they need a man in thier lives. Someone who can be a positive male role model for your children ! If you believe that no man like this exists , and it's true there aren't many good men left.... Go out and find yourself a good fu-k buddy & forget about relationships for awhile .After all , time between just you and your kids is the most precious ! Don't forget that your children do learn from you. No need to mess them up any more than they already will be , when they realize that not even thier own fathers really wanted them around.
2006-09-03 01:10:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by listenup_yall 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The laws biased in favour of women as mothers.Thats why fathers for justice are making protests about it.Its very sad thats there no equlaity in the law and judges think that men cant look after children.
2006-09-02 22:30:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
both parents are needed but you are right the courts always give custody to the mother which is not right she then goes one step further and poisons the kids from the father it happens far to much
2006-09-06 20:09:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
now adays it isn't always like that. my 2 sons have custody and my brother has custody. it is sad that mothers don't want to be moms like they use to. custody goes to the most fit parent . if both are fit then the judge gives joint custody
2006-09-02 22:30:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by lefftylucy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. I'm afraid it's usually done to how biased the head bench chappie is, and who's got the best lawyer.
The law and justice are very distant cousins, and they ain't talking to each other.
Keep in there, keep in touch, keep the head, keep the peace, keep the love and you will get to keep the children.
Good luck.
2006-09-02 22:28:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Alzebub 3
·
0⤊
0⤋