Why is Bush opening up our borders? Do Conservatives like Bush now?

Question

Conservatives say they have confirmation that Bush is opening up our borders with Canada and Mexico. Conservatives claim that the next terror attack will be because of Bush's open borders policy. They say he sold America out by forming the North American Union.

Conservatives say that America will be replaced by the North American Union. The N.A.U will override our courts. Also he's giving all of our import - export jobs over to Mexico. Cheaper goods will be shipped from other countries to Mexico were Mexican drivers will take over for American drivers anf deliver goods.

They claim this is his globalist agenda aka new world order. But don't take my word for it, click on these links to Republican Conservative magazine article and read it for yourself (there goes the liberal media excuse)http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=14965
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/august2006/290806bushresponsible.htm

Answer 1

The border with Canada isn't and can't be closed. For one thing there are so many buildings and main streets stradding it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haskell_Free_Library_and_Opera_House

As for the Mexican border, Bush's cronies in business and agriculture want cheap labor. Having so many unemployed illegal migrants with no legal protection keeps the wages of all unskilled workers, including American citizens, at poverty level. And assures more profits for those cronies.

Who will see to it that Bush is well rewarded after he leaves office. Remember the $2 million Reagan got from the Japanese for a couple of speeches right after he left the White House?

BUT if you are referring to NAFTA, that Ross Perot said would suck jobs down to Mexico, you're mistaken. Jobs were sucked over to China by globalization and the WTO and by a decision to ignore their communist imperialism.

NAFTA sucked agricultural jobs up from Mexico -- which is exactly why Mexicans come north now. The USA subsidizes crops like corn and sugar and tobacco and cotton and unsubsidized Mexican farmers can't compete. So they and their farmworkers, their families starving, come north. NAFTA means Mexico can't keep US farm products out.

Answer 2

I'm a conservative and have been looking into this North American Union thing before it was even made offical (when the site actually opened up). Now I like Bush and a lot of the things he does, but it is a fact he is trying to merge Canada, USA, and Mexico into one superstate. Not only bush but also canadian PM Harper and Vicente Fox (when he was president of Mexico) were also pushing for it.

Vicente Fox spilled the beans once too (i wish i had the quote).

I don't know if NAU will override our rights. What I am hoping for is an american-like government set up.

Answer 3

You know what? I've already done my Quota for Bitter, Ranty and Despairing for one night....(1:51 a.m. locally as I type this, sorry)....

So I am going to just lay this out for you. Here are your choices:

--email me sometime when I am not so tired, and we can swap notes on how to be Bitter, Ranty, etc. for a whole new generation so that in two years time--barring the utter collapse of human civilization--we can create a nation that wants nothing more than to see the Rich Men and the "conservatives" they own HANG....

--Get used to singing the Theme Song from "Pinky and the Brain" as your new National Anthem,

--Or....treat all this as one huge, demented Chinese Fortune Cookie. You know how people have a habit of saying "In Bed" at the end of each fortune?

Well, at the end of each "Why..." question about Bush, you can always just spit out, "Because he's a Pampered Rich Idiot". Much the same deal....try it!

Why did he let Bin Laden get away and live in Afghanistan?

Why did he read "My Pet Goat" on the morning of 9-11?

Why did he almost sell our Port Security to Dubai?

Why are we in Iraq? (ok, maybe that needs an "Well, it's a family vendetta *and*..." first, but still, you get the point)

But then again, what do I know, if we all started doing that, the Pampered Rich Idiots might end up *suing* for defamation of character (being led by Paris Hilton of all people!).

Hell, if Texas had half a brain they'd already *disown* the whole lot of them, but well....that is just Texas for you. They have a reputation to keep, and are competing with *Kansas* for being Imbecile and Whackjob Central don't you know?

Hope this helps. ;)

Answer 4

this is regrettably real that our government, definite, the President and the Senate have finished immeasurable injury and disservice to our united states's nicely being and protection. the abode of Representatives did the suited element, in spite of the shown fact that all of it ends interior the Senate. Bush grew to become right into a great first-term President, yet has been awful in term 2 and is on the choice end with mainstream human beings. the place are the 6000 troops for the border?? they're honestly couriers and dishwashers. they have no authority to do something similar to physique protection. don't be fooled. Our governments own head-in-the-sand mindset is the two as risky as Al-Qaeda. we are being bankrupted via illegals who top off the jails, the welfare lines, hospitals, etc. And while the subsequent secession occurs (So California, New Mexico, Arizona, Texas), the liberals interior of something of the states will only whine concerning to the completed element.

Answer 5

Thank you. You have further added to my confusion about which political candidate to choose on the upcoming election. Bush does support big business and big business would probably like to pay Mexican truck drivers pennies on the dime rather than a decent paycheck. Why do you think we really don't patrol our borders? Our politicians don't want them closed. Just remember that in the end, they will also lose their precious jobs to immigrant labor.

Answer 6

I assure you, CONGRESS deserves the blame for this. Bush does not make the laws or control the budget for their enforcement.

Where Bush gets blame is for not doing his job - that is, declaring an emergency and enacting a repeat of Eisenhower's 'Operation VVetback'. The President does have the authority to use military force to stop an invasion.

Answer 7

Im a staunch conservative.

I agree with you 110%. I support Bush on many and most things. My biggest complaint against him is his refusal to even slow the Mexican invasion.

Answer 8

No, we conservatives don't like him now on issues such as this. But that is not to be interpreted that we somehow would like the party that is overtly demonic.

The bottom line is that the whole thing's a mess and we seem to find a worthy leader.

Answer 9

No one likes Bush now.

He makes all Americans look like uneducated, poorly mannered, rednecks.

Answer 10

dont know dont care...long as all the hot a** mexicans come over thats fine with me