2006-09-02 19:02:58 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
i was placing a 3-5 year time frame before our military becomes totally strained.
2006-09-02 19:18:20 · update #1
It is entirely possible that the Bush junta will run out of human material soon and will reinstate a draft to burn up the youngsters.
But rest assured, none of the rich and powerful will have to send their kids. They will be whisked off to the Champagne Squadron like our heroic president George W(orthless) Bush was. Given his good example they (the rich kids) will also not live up to their commitments.
2006-09-02 19:49:13 · answer #1 · answered by The answer man 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The ONLY politician in Washington who's talking about re-instating the draft is Charles Rangle (D-NY)... he actually introduced legislation to reinstate the draft in 2004...and then voted against his own bill (along with everyone else).
The military doesn't want a draft...they want people who want to be there.
You should know by now that John Kerry lied to you in 2004 when he said Bush would re-instate the draft (Bush couldn't do it if he wanted to , which he doesn't)... Kerry was taking advantage of idiots out there who don't understand how a draft actually is implemented.
2006-09-03 01:11:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I doubt we are going to send 14 year olds into war.
By the way, our all-volunteer army is not even fully deployed in Iraq or Afghanistan. We have plenty of troops. We also have met all of our recruitment goals. Why do we need to worry about a draft?
Our army is the most powerful on the planet, and we have superior technology. We don't need millions of troops like China, because we don't fight 20th century wars anymore. You are seriously overreacting to the anti-Bush media that poo-poos every war fought by a Republican and cheers every war fought by a Democrat.
The media couldn't get enough of Clinton bombing Kosovo. It was the most wonderful thing ever done.The Kosovars, who had last seen a bombing raid on their nation in WWII by the Nazis, looked up to see their allies, the United States, bombing them for suppressing an Arab invasion led by Jihadist conquerors. Clinton did this without UN, congressional, or public approval. The media did not attack him for it.
Since then, Arab migration into Europe has led to riots in France, threats against Danish newspapers, subway bombings in England, and a recently-thwarted terrorist attack last month, which originated in merry old England.
By the Brits?
No, they were all Arabs. Every last terrorist has been an Arab Muslim or a recent convert to Islam. And very few have been non-Arab.
Put the pieces of the puzzle together. You can call it whatever you want; racism, hate speech. But the facts, yes, the FACTS are not racist, nor are they motivated by hate. They are simply facts. Don't blame the victim for the behavior of the aggressor.
2006-09-02 19:07:00 · answer #3 · answered by askthepizzaguy 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Why couldn't they draft Prisoners into the military?
Sounds like a good idea to me!
There will NEVER be a DRAFT into the US Military!!!
Besides, YOU have to be 18 to be in the Military!
2006-09-02 19:15:17 · answer #4 · answered by jennifersuem 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
IF there was a draft, the people who would be drafted would be 19-22 year olds, not 14-17 year olds. but there wont be a draft. it would be political suicide for either of the parties to reinstitute the draft, because then the other party will just go and say "they will send your sons and daughters to their deaths overseas!"
2006-09-02 19:11:13 · answer #5 · answered by supremelorderik 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
porbably more like 16~18
2006-09-02 19:08:09 · answer #6 · answered by nooyleinad 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
its never going to happen
2006-09-02 20:04:56 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
All will be dead soon...............
2006-09-02 19:50:58 · answer #8 · answered by Saood 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋