2006-09-02 18:41:59 · 7 answers · asked by Searcher 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Because it is a personal issue with President Bush. This is why he ws willing to lie to and deceive the American public about WMD's. He is trying to bring about Armagedeon and the return of Christ. Mr, Bush is a radical Christian right wing fanatic with revenge and an insane intention to see his "saviour." God help us all.
2006-09-02 18:52:40 · answer #1 · answered by pjr3579 1 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Saddam just got caught quicker than Osama. Those terrorists are nasty tough to track down. We should do the Bourne Supremacy thing -put in a chip to some of their confidants so we can track them and kill them to prevent any further bloodshed. Remember, Osama was kicked out of his birth country - Saudi Arabia and he has a vendetta against all Westerners. It's his reason for living but how can Muslims - extremists or not be proud of a man who takes innocent lives and plows them in the Towers in NYC?
2006-09-02 18:46:41 · answer #2 · answered by bcbound 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
We had a better idea of where Saddam was over Osama
2006-09-02 18:43:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
in accordance to comments from troops on the floor, Osama bin encumbered became into surrounded at Tora Bora in December 2001, yet Bush/Rumsfeld did no longer supply the order to end the challenge. This gave upward push to distinctive hypothesis with reference to the Bush relatives's long-time friendship with the Royal Saudi Arabia relatives, the bin Ladens, yet additionally led to those who had considered Michael Moore's authentic "Fahrenheit 9/11" documentary no rely if the delay in taking photos would have been on the subject rely of money-making schemes for the no-bid contractors affiliated with administration officers, rather cult-evangelically run Trijicon and Blackwater (now Xe), and vp Cheney's business company Halliburton and/or its subsidiary KBR (of electrocuting our infantrymen in Iraq in badly under pressure showers notoriety). i does not positioned the variety of greed-pushed shenanigans previous the ruthless, lawless previous administration in any respect...would you? in terms of Osama bin encumbered being authentic, our CIA decrease than Reagan/Bush knowledgeable a teenage bin encumbered to flow against Russia lower back interior the Nineteen Eighties---he exists (or did then besides). examine out all and sundry who has invested interior the businesses who gained the no-bid contracts in the two Iraq or Afghanistan and maybe we can settle on if there became into some profiteering clarification for the "failure" to seize this one dude after 9 years, inspite of the Bush ties to the guy's relatives.
2016-12-18 03:56:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all, you can't make that claim because you don't KNOW for certain that they didn't "focus" more on one or the other.
The simple fact is: OBL could be ANYWHERE. SH was likely in the country of Iraq, so he was just easier to capture. That, and luck...pure luck on the part of our troops. If they hadn't investigated that cover on his little hole he was hiding in, he still might be on the loose!
2006-09-02 18:53:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is one stupid question. Nobody here knows aw we are not priviledged to that kind of info. Ask for speculation next time.
2006-09-02 19:00:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
when it became convenient to do so
2006-09-02 18:45:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋