I for one cant wait. But The innevedible terrorist attack is strategically coming up. So I'm sure that will affect things.
How much you want to bet another tape mysteriously appears... LOL the republican fascists are so damn predictable
2006-09-02 17:52:08 · 19 answers · asked by Mr. Dissent 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes, Bush needs to go.
2006-09-02 17:54:58 · answer #1 · answered by Cara Beth 6 · 3⤊ 6⤋
I don't know if the Dems will win in November, but I do believe the next President will be a Democrat, unless perhaps Hillary is the Democratic candidate. I don't believe the country is ready to elect a female President yet.
Will I be happy if the Dems win in November? I don't think I will feel anything either way. Both parties are corrupt, self-serving entities, and politicians that have reached that level have already sold their souls.
2006-09-06 12:42:54 · answer #2 · answered by Nunya B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO, I will be happy when the damn Muslim terrorists are deleted permanently and when the southern US border is closed and all illegal aliens and their children are deported. Even happier to see a law enacted that will grant a FIVE year minimum prison sentence for employers who employ illegal aliens.
BTW: Bush is a LIBERAL.
The terrorists would be active HERE if Kerry had been elected.... and I am still not a Bush fan. Don't you just love the "lesser of two evils" methodology of voting?
2006-09-02 17:58:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
there will be a conflict coming interior the destiny and it rather is going to be a conflict for components. China will lose. it rather is not approximately numbers, through fact the subsequent conflict often is the final conflict. the country will strike first and it rather is going to be one hundred% nuclear and it won't count how a lot of human beings are left status, through fact the intial strike against China will wipe out a minimum of a million/third of their inhabitants and that they are going to be unable to retaliate, yet their allies will. considerable US cities would be crippled and our management will bypass underground. whilst the airborne dirt and dust settles, the worldwide, the entire worldwide would be a barren region.
2016-11-24 19:20:13 · answer #4 · answered by mckernan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Number one. Bush can not run again. He has had his two terms.
Number two. Most V.P.s under a President get the nod for Presidential Candidate. Chaney wont. So who else do they have? Like it are not the Democrats are going to sweep the next Presidential election and most other elections that year.
2006-09-02 18:20:54 · answer #5 · answered by art m 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The problem with your hypothesis is the Dem's wont win. Why you ask? It is because they have not yet figured out a platform with substantive ideas or goals with a realistic opportunity of success.
2006-09-02 18:03:57 · answer #6 · answered by hedddon 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'll be ecstatic when there is a change over from republican to democrat. You are right about the tape, maybe eve Osama bin Laden himself, although they may save that one for the presidential election.
2006-09-02 17:56:54 · answer #7 · answered by Tommy D 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Could Charles Dobson Focus on the Fam be a terrorist?
http://obsessionthemovie.com/
2006-09-02 17:54:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
actually im afraid that it doesnt matter who or from which party the next pres is ... he is guaranteed i think, to be groomed and indoctrinated by the "shadow govt" of the elite powerful people who pull all the strings .... a president "for the people" is a concept and ideal that died with kennedy so dont expect much to change ... it will just be the next corrupt pres .... same problems same issues.... different distractions.
2006-09-02 18:00:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bush is fighting a war on terror while the democrats are fighting a war on Bush!
2006-09-02 18:00:00 · answer #10 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No.
The only advantage the Democratic party has is that they are not quite as dogmatic and restrictive as the Republicans. It would basically be trading wasteful over-spenders for fascist over-spenders. Not a big improvement.
Thing responsibly. Vote Libertarian.
2006-09-02 17:56:34 · answer #11 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋