unless government-approved tests are administered and a history of diagnoses are available, i don't think psychology can play too much of an objective role in conviction.
2006-09-02 17:30:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Nick Fury 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
traditionally psychologists testify to the results of testing they administered to the defendant or victim...occasionally a witness..more recently, psychologists are employed by defense attorneys to assist in all phases of the defense including jury selection, and presentation of evidence. "Forensic" psychologists are increasingly known for manipulating the mileu in hopes of ensuring an acquittal. This type of court room expertise was popularized by writer Earl Stanley Gardner, author of most Perry Mason stories, who advocated everything from explosions to cutting the power in order to distract the jury during the state's presentation of damning evidence. But it's only fair as the state will stop at nothing to ensure a conviction. "Forensic" psychologists will tell you that all their actions are done only to level the playing field, and they're probably right.
2006-09-02 18:00:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is used to a great extent but unfortunately the wrong way. their job is to turn a criminal into a victim, which is ok, but they carry it to the extreme. cops want to make criminals afraid of them, which again is ok, but in the process theyve made everyone else fearful of them to the point of not trusting. i wish everyone could spend 1 week in a court room to watch what goes on. for the most part, its a joke. if your looking for intellect in our system, youve got one hell of a job in front of you. money has taken over everything. i majored in psyc. in college and quickly dropped out because i didnt agree with what was being taught, i still dont, and it hasnt changed. everyone is put into a catagory regardless of their problems and what might have made them the way they are. the court system is really screwed up as is the rest of our government. i strayed from the question, didnt i? sorry.
2006-09-02 18:04:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by chris l 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
opposite to usual theory the founding fathers did no longer actually put in the form a specifically exact article overlaying the judicial branch. additionally no remember what occurs the final court docket has the perfect say in all themes. that's stumbled on below the Supremacy and Elastic Clause.
2016-11-06 07:55:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pyschology can help you understand the reason and the means a person did a crime. It helps understand and places you one step ahead of where you should be. For example, knowing hor a murder thinks allows you to know where he or she is going next. Knowing pyschology also helps you to make quick, well-thought out decisions and aid in telling whether a person is lying or telling the truth.
2006-09-02 17:33:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Robin C 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Psychology is useful in predicting how the human mind may work to commit a crime.
2006-09-02 17:29:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by eugene65ca 6
·
0⤊
0⤋