English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It is a good question to ask. I think the family
would be better off. The children would be off the streets because parents would stop looking out for number # 1 and than teaching strong values & morals which we need ever more now in the society. Commitment has cost. All of us need to pull up our socks and don't be a quiter at anything. If a individual don't stand for something. That individual will fell for anything. We need more leaders with very strong values & morals. Well people see what they're prepared to see and like they say you reap what you sow. Hey I know this a individual can't change if that individual don't knowledge it . Well it is a hard core fact here. Can anyone make a horse drink water when that horse is at the water ? Nope no one can do that.

2006-09-02 17:11:29 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships Marriage & Divorce

7 answers

Yeah,I agree with your thought and statement.

2006-09-02 17:22:52 · answer #1 · answered by ryladie99 6 · 1 0

Marriage, the definition of that notice has no longer something to do with comparable intercourse 'unions'. If human beings actually need to diminish interior the process the purple tape call a marriage a marriage call a 'union' or a 'coupling' in basic terms that. yet enable's no longer attempt to in positive condition around or sq. pegs into famous individual of david holes... the subject to hand is extra approximately coverage, who can attend at a well being facility, and reward interior the artwork tension. human beings have been having relationships as they choose for the era of background, this era has no longer invented comparable intercourse options, nor has it invented killing toddlers in or out of the womb. save up adequate funds, make investments it properly, get a solid criminal expert who can write a settlement for purposes of understanding sharing and beneficiaries to conceal the bases and recover from it. If a individual or persons choose to stay outdoors of societial structures then they might desire to create structures that help them and not whine like toddlers to be fed from the trough they shun or spit at. If a actual answer have been the subject it could have been executed earlier. below the guise of 'that's a civil rights difficulty' extra harm has been allowed to ensue than is fairly needed. stop banging on a closed door and create an commencing that's amenable to the actual difficulty. Marriage is marriage is heterosexual.... bypass away IT on my own and create a shape that non-heterosexuals can play on that's barely for homosexuals on my own.

2016-11-06 07:54:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

but marriage is not honered by all, the courts favor a women in divorce, the laws on marriage with reguards to equity are not equitable at all towards men ( and you can thank the feminst movement for that ). in fact marriage is nothing more than a legal and binding contract that 2 parties enter into. what does that have to do with love? nothing.. but you be hard pressed to find a women to marry unless she has that legal document, it her finacial equivalant ot a mini lottery should she decide to cash it in, at the man's expense. where is the honor in that? she usally gets warded full custody and he pay fincially and emotionally for that.. where's the honor in that?
the parent's should be number 1 in any family
after all why should a man marry?
there is no benefit in it for him
what with a women who can ( due to no fault divorce laws ) leave him at any time and there is no consequences ( socially or finacial ) for her.
in the old days before feminism and womnes indepenance
the man was takebn care of, he worked hard for his family, the women had her place and was happy to tend the home while the husband pulled in the money, divorce rates were extremly low back then, and not without shame nor scandal attached.
but such values ( and honor ) are gone.. in it's place is a hostile 2 party independance system.. the myth that a women can have it all is just that, a myth, someone needs to be home watching the kids while the husband works. there is no incentive for a man anymore, he works. comes home to an empty house with a note saying microwave your own dinner, he washes his own clothes, pretty much he live as a bachleor inside of a marriage. pretty soon kids enter the picture and the sex is gone, the wife no longer looks tempting as she has let her self go, gaining weight and looking frumpy in the process. then one day she has an affair ( more and more women are cheating now a days ), she file for divorce, they sell the house, he pay alimony, child support and is pretty much broke for her actions. all this due the fact that she has been told by women's orginizations that it better like this, she has the freedom now ( she was never slave.. but you never know it by the way they put it ) to do as she pleases, this includes having affiars, and divorcing.

until that prevaling attitude is stopped among women you never have honor back in marriage. the divorce rate proves me out ( higher that 50% ), all these women who think they found the "one" have not..there is no social stigma anymore when someone cheats or divorces, or is a single mother, parent, has a child out of wedlock.. that's been cosidered politically incorrect to label them as such..pre nups are the norm.. and why not... you cannot honestly think it going to work anymore.. women are far too fickle to stay in a marriage...

where's the honor in that?

2006-09-02 17:31:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

society would be the same.....some of what you say is true....some peeps just werent meant to have little ones....there can be divorce and still be order if the parents care about the young-uns,problem with the children is not the problems with parents breaking up its the problem with the parents not being parents

2006-09-02 17:21:02 · answer #4 · answered by mrsannman 2 · 0 1

Very interesting comments, but unfortunately I don't understand your exact question...?

2006-09-02 17:19:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

right

2006-09-02 17:15:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

THERE WOULD BE A LOT MORE CHEATERS

2006-09-02 17:40:52 · answer #7 · answered by Do I know you? ya right LoL 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers