English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am pondering the speed required to do this. Can a life form sustain possible G forces or would this be altering our atomic make up disasembaling and reassembaling it at the conclution of travel. Would this indicate time travel?

2006-09-02 16:49:43 · 14 answers · asked by Any Key! Push Me 7 in Science & Mathematics Physics

14 answers

No. This would violate causality, require travel faster than the speed of light, and consequentially more than infinite energy.

-Tom

2006-09-02 17:21:11 · answer #1 · answered by tomz17 2 · 0 0

I don't have the answer for you.
I do feel G forces will only come into play when motion takes place. On Earth we are subject to time. To start at a given point and to travel away and then come back to that same point before your departure time would be a case of going back in time. But if you went back in time, would you be reliving your past?
Einstein showed mathematically that a space ship could leave this earth, travel out into space and come back to earth at a time before it took off. Because of this and other experiences what becomes clear is that during this Earth life we are subject to time.
Once the time factor exists, I don't know if it's possible to return back before your departure time. I tend to think that G forces are associated with mass. If so, it leads me to wonder if time is subject to gravity.

2006-09-03 00:10:22 · answer #2 · answered by Brenmore 5 · 0 0

This is exactly why it is dangerous to fly against the planets rotation because each time you cross the international dateline you lose a day and with frequent flyer miles the next thing you know you're a drooling baby or an old man(hedelberg uncertanty principle And Einstein theory of relatives).

Normally watches are used to measure time travel BUT if we were to convert our matter to energy form than yes... but do not forget the warnings of becoming lost in infinite possibilites which branch forward and backward... travel light as you always lose your luggage anyway... which can be so way embarassing ask Lenny Davinci.

And as he was always relearning when he arrived right before leaving he was WOW(Way Out of When).

2006-09-03 00:03:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Not really. The closest approximation was the SST flying from Heathrow to New York, which left London at around 10 AM (London time) and got to New York at about 8:30 AM (Eastern time). But as for actually going back in time, it cannot be done, on earth or anywhere else.

2006-09-02 23:53:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. Since final value of 0/0 implies sky is blue, any source of light when so fast travelling would be exceeding light speed past alien base on moon.

Is great ponderment for you?


Doug

2006-09-02 23:53:59 · answer #5 · answered by doug_donaghue 7 · 1 0

Sure. No problem. Just travel across the International Date Line and you will arrive the day before you left.

;-D You could celebrate your birthday twice, but not gain an extra year!

2006-09-02 23:54:13 · answer #6 · answered by China Jon 6 · 1 0

I don't think it is possible. Of course you can fly somewhere with a time difference but you still wouldn't be achieving the time travel because you never traveled back in time.

2006-09-02 23:58:56 · answer #7 · answered by DEE 2 · 0 0

I'm pondering on why you answered my question with random babbling.

Are you ill willed?

What's the problem, please tell me.

Do you know how to use full and functioning sentences?

And how rude of you to call me a poor child.

Pepper spray?

Male.

2006-09-03 01:43:08 · answer #8 · answered by Elitist, much? 3 · 0 0

no but we can fly fast enough that you get to your destination before the time you departed.

time zones

2006-09-03 00:51:02 · answer #9 · answered by LARCO 4 · 0 0

Well...actually you HAVE to be at your departure point BEFORE you can depart...lol.

2006-09-02 23:55:49 · answer #10 · answered by my two cents 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers