what is the difference between libertarianism and anarchy?

Question

Ok, so what kind of government would exist in a libertarian system if there was one (what power would it have?)

Answer 1

Libertarians believe in a small government with limited powers for the common good. Anarchy is no government or no state.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarianism

Answer 2

Anarchy is political - this is the abolition of the state - enable the folk rule. Libertarianism is financial - finished 'laissez faire' capitalism (i.e. no welfare, no social protection, no social protection nets in besides). Anarchy grew to become into invented via the Russian Bakunin or the Frenchman Prudhome, and is considered the purist form of democracy. It advocates eliminating the state equipment and enable the folk do their element. It does not recommend chaos. all and sundry tend to artwork at the same time for his or her mutual income, only look at any community in any enormous city. Its the state that interferes and motives issues. Anarcho-capitalism seems a sturdy option form of government than the hypocrisy of federalism.

Answer 3

They are similar, with one huge massive significant difference.

Libertarianism is a political model that calls for minimal government, maximum personal liberties, and personal accountability.

Anarchy is an anti-political model that opposes all government, in the name of maximum personal liberties.

The key difference is that a Libertarian believes in the rule of law, and believes in enforcing and protecting the legal rights of individuals. Libertarians just want to do it efficiently, and with the minimal governmental overhead possible.

Answer 4

great answers!

have you ever noticed that only people who want big government can't seem to understand the difference?

Answer 5

libertarians believe in small gov .......anarchists no gov