“We are dealing with a country that can really finance its own reconstruction and relatively soon.”
- Paul Wolfowitz
(rewarded with apppointment to presidency
of the World Bank)
“And a year from now, I’ll be very surprised if there is not some grand square in Baghdad that is named after President Bush. There is no doubt that, with the exception of a very small number of people close to a vicious regime, the people of Iraq have been liberated and they understand that they’ve been liberated. And it is getting easier every day for Iraqis to express that sense of liberation.”
- Richard Perle
(now with the American Enterprise Institute)
“[T]he American part of this will be $1.7 billion. We have no plans for any further-on funding for this.”
- Andrew Natsios
(now teaching at Georgetown University)
Mitch Daniels had said the war would be an “affordable endeavor” and rejected an estimate by the chief White House economic adviser that the war would cost between $100 billion and $200 billion as “very, very high.”
- Mitch Daniels
(now Governor of Indiana)
“It’s a slam dunk case.”
- George Tenet
(since awarded Presidential Medal of Freedom)
“I think they’re in the last throes, if you will, of the insurgency.”
- Richard B. Cheney, June 2005)
(still the VP)
“Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof — the smoking gun — that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.”
- George Walker Bush
(still the pretzeldent)
2006-09-02 15:46:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Joe D 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
In all probability.... as I said from the beginning.. it will be a total waste. The American politicians know NOTHING about fighting a war.. look at how THEY lost the war in Korea.... how they lost the war in Vietnam.. They will NEVER win the war in Afghanistan as I said from the very beginning.. nor will they win the war in Iraq because the Americans JUST DO NOT have the know how to fighting such a war.
2006-09-02 15:31:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
NO!! Were fighting daddy Bush's war.He must be so proud of his son.With all that money everyone in the USA could of had free medical coverage and there would be no homeless people.
2006-09-02 15:32:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
If the oil companies get the rights to the oil fields, then maybe yes and maybe no. Depends on who profits more from the oil, you and the rest of the people in the U. S. or the oil companies....
2006-09-02 15:32:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
no, killing innocent people is never cost effective...think of all the people we could have fed with that money! schools we could have built! bridges we could have repaired! taxes we could have cut!
It was all just a big waste of time, money, and lives.
2006-09-02 15:33:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by kemchan2 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
I'm not sure. How much are the Kurds' lives worth, for instance?
2006-09-02 15:30:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
NO. its not only money, you can print money. think about all the solders that got killed and injured for no reason.
2006-09-02 15:29:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by persianempire6 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
call it our investment.
the ones you should ask are the now free people of iraq
2006-09-02 15:30:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by dcall2 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
It's an investment. Consider it seed money.
2006-09-02 15:27:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by normobrian 6
·
0⤊
5⤋
I think you have too many zeros . . .
2006-09-02 15:30:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by wotana02 3
·
0⤊
3⤋