Evening news say there are major crack downs on Terrorist cells in Britan, but there are thousands of Muslins in the UK. Do you think Bush will want to bomb them to rubble? Remember civilians, women, babies, all are collateral damage , when terrorists are there.
We sent emergency orders of munitions, 5,000# bunker busters, and cluster bombs to Israel to bomb civilians in Lebanon because 'terrorists' were there hiding. They're hiding in England, too!
2006-09-02
14:15:31
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
The question was tongue in cheek, but I do think our government , when push comes to shove , would not approve bombing primarily white populations if 50% were Islamic "suspected" terrorists.
2006-09-02
14:38:40 ·
update #1
Any one who took my question seriously needs a serious dose common sense; of course Bush wouldn't suggest bombing England if it had more Al Qaida members then Lebanon had Hezbollah!
But Bush is quick on the trigger to decimate Mid East countries, or providing the means to do so, using the worn out phrase, terror, terror, terror, when there are ulterior means for doing it.
If he were serious, major efforts would have been taken to get Bin Laden and those operating terrorist training camps in Pakistan.
2006-09-02
22:44:28 ·
update #2
Please vote for one another , you've nothing much to offer anyone else.
2006-09-02
22:56:06 ·
update #3