English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

No evidence Proving Popeye,or Bluto.

2006-09-02 13:04:17 · 13 answers · asked by Skeeter 5 in Entertainment & Music Comics & Animation

13 answers

In 1933, Popeye received a foundling baby in the mail, whom he adopted and named "Swee'Pea". And the rest is history!

2006-09-02 13:14:37 · answer #1 · answered by peg 5 · 1 0

No proof that Swee'pea is even Olive Oyl's son, she could be babysitting, Popeye was a sailor maybe his goil OLive needed the extra cash, she'd never make it as a hooker.

2006-09-02 13:08:28 · answer #2 · answered by snoop_dougie_doug04 5 · 0 0

Had to be Popeye's son. Sweet Pea had a squinty eye and huge forearms.

2006-09-02 13:13:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Cleetus Jones

2016-12-23 11:05:20 · answer #4 · answered by OG 1 · 0 0

no one really knows sweet pea was actually adopted

2006-09-02 13:06:39 · answer #5 · answered by JAMMIE STARR 2 · 0 0

Poop Deck Pappy

2006-09-02 13:10:09 · answer #6 · answered by D-Train 3 · 0 0

sweet pea is adopted

2006-09-02 13:10:14 · answer #7 · answered by crissyll22 4 · 0 0

Black Eye Pea...

2006-09-02 13:09:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No evidence of either...

2006-09-02 13:06:02 · answer #9 · answered by T Time 6 · 0 0

It was an immaculate conception :)

2006-09-02 13:06:30 · answer #10 · answered by stormieserenity 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers